Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences. (Marine ecotoxicology)
Groningen university. (COCOON)
Groningen University. (MarBEE)
Groningen University. (Animal ecology)
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. e42060Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recovery of an ecosystem following disturbance can be severely hampered or even shift altogether when a point disturbance exceeds a certain spatial threshold. Such scale-dependent dynamics may be caused by preemptive competition, but may also result from diminished self-facilitation due to weakened ecosystem engineering. Moreover, disturbance can facilitate colonization by engineering species that alter abiotic conditions in ways that exacerbate stress on the original species. Consequently, establishment of such counteracting engineers might reduce the spatial threshold for the disturbance, by effectively slowing recovery and increasing the risk for ecosystem shifts to alternative states. We tested these predictions in an intertidal mudflat characterized by a two-state mosaic of hummocks (humps exposed during low tide) dominated by the sediment-stabilizing seagrass Zostera noltii) and hollows (low-tide waterlogged depressions dominated by the bioturbating lugworm Arenicola marina). In contrast to expectations, seagrass recolonized both natural and experimental clearings via lateral expansion and seemed unaffected by both clearing size and lugworm addition. Near the end of the growth season, however, an additional disturbance (most likely waterfowl grazing and/or strong hydrodynamics) selectively impacted recolonizing seagrass in the largest (1 m2) clearings (regardless of lugworm addition), and in those medium (0.25 m2) clearings where lugworms had been added nearly five months earlier. Further analyses showed that the risk for the disturbance increased with hollow size, with a threshold of 0.24 m2. Hollows of that size were caused by seagrass removal alone in the largest clearings, and by a weaker seagrass removal effect exacerbated by lugworm bioturbation in the medium clearings. Consequently, a sufficiently large disturbance increased the vulnerability of recolonizing seagrass to additional disturbance by weakening seagrass engineering effects (sediment stabilization). Meanwhile, the counteracting ecosystem engineering (lugworm bioturbation) reduced that threshold size. Therefore, scale-dependent interactions between habitat-mediated facilitation, competition and disturbance seem to maintain the spatial two-state mosaic in this ecosystem.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. e42060
Keyword [en]
seagrass; herbivory; grazing; feedback; disturbance; sediment; ecosystem engineer
National Category
Research subject
Animal Ecology; Applied Environmental Science; Ecological Botany
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-86882DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023229OAI: diva2:589998
Formas, 2008-839
Available from: 2013-01-21 Created: 2013-01-21 Last updated: 2013-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Eklöf et al. 2011. PloS ONE.(547 kB)134 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 547 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eklöf, Johan
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 134 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link