Quality-Based Conditional Processing in Multi-Biometrics: Application to Sensor Interoperability
2010 (English)In: IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. Part A. Systems and humans, ISSN 1083-4427, E-ISSN 1558-2426, Vol. 40, no 6, 1168-1179 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
As biometric technology is increasingly deployed, it will be common to replace parts of operational systems with newer designs. The cost and inconvenience of reacquiring enrolled users when a new vendor solution is incorporated makes this approach difficult and many applications will require to deal with information from different sources regularly. These interoperability problems can dramatically affect the performance of biometric systems and thus, they need to be overcome. Here, we describe and evaluate the ATVS-UAM fusion approach submitted to the quality-based evaluation of the 2007 BioSecure Multimodal Evaluation Campaign, whose aim was to compare fusion algorithms when biometric signals were generated using several biometric devices in mismatched conditions. Quality measures from the raw biometric data are available to allow system adjustment to changing quality conditions due to device changes. This system adjustment is referred to as quality-based conditional processing. The proposed fusion approach is based on linear logistic regression, in which fused scores tend to be log-likelihood-ratios. This allows the easy and efficient combination of matching scores from different devices assuming low dependence among modalities. In our system, quality information is used to switch between different system modules depending on the data source (the sensor in our case) and to reject channels with low quality data during the fusion. We compare our fusion approach to a set of rule-based fusion schemes over normalized scores. Results show that the proposed approach outperforms all the rule-based fusion schemes. We also show that with the quality-based channel rejection scheme, an overall improvement of 25% in the equal error rate is obtained. © 2010 IEEE.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2010. Vol. 40, no 6, 1168-1179 p.
Biometrics, biosecure, calibration, fusion, interoperability, linear logistic regression, quality, scalability
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-21195DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2047498ISI: 000283447200004ScopusID: 2-s2.0-77958084422OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-21195DiVA: diva2:589117