Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Knowledge translation in Uganda: a qualitative study of Ugandan midwives' and managers' perceived relevance of the sub-elements of the context cornerstone in the PARIHS framework
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Implementation science, ISSN 1748-5908, Vol. 7, 117Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the annual 3.3 million neonatal deaths could be averted if there was a high uptake of basic evidence-based practices. In order to overcome this 'know-do' gap, there is an urgent need for in-depth understanding of knowledge translation (KT). A major factor to consider in the successful translation of knowledge into practice is the influence of organizational context. A theoretical framework highlighting this process is Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS). However, research linked to this framework has almost exclusively been conducted in high-income countries. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the perceived relevance of the subelements of the organizational context cornerstone of the PARIHS framework, and also whether other factors in the organizational context were perceived to influence KT in a specific low-income setting.

METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in a district of Uganda, where focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted with midwives (n = 18) and managers (n = 5) within the catchment area of the general hospital. The interview guide was developed based on the context sub-elements in the PARIHS framework (receptive context, culture, leadership, and evaluation). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, followed by directed content analysis of the data.

RESULTS: The sub-elements of organizational context in the PARIHS framework--i.e., receptive context, culture, leadership, and evaluation--also appear to be relevant in a low-income setting like Uganda, but there are additional factors to consider. Access to resources, commitment and informal payment, and community involvement were all perceived to play important roles for successful KT.

CONCLUSIONS: In further development of the context assessment tool, assessing factors for successful implementation of evidence in low-income settings--resources, community involvement, and commitment and informal payment--should be considered for inclusion. For low-income settings, resources are of significant importance, and might be considered as a separate subelement of the PARIHS framework as a whole.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2012. Vol. 7, 117
Keyword [en]
Organizational context, PARIHS, Knowledge translation, Low-income settings, Focus group discussions, Interviews
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-11602DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-117ISI: 000313208200001PubMedID: 23206670OAI: diva2:582701
Available from: 2013-01-06 Created: 2013-01-06 Last updated: 2016-05-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(469 kB)96 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 469 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallin, Lars
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 96 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 566 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link