Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Validation of an IT Investment Evaluation Model in Health and Social Care: A case study of ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS)
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Informatics.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Business Informatics.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The traditional IT investment evaluation methods and/or techniques tend to measure the quantitative value added by eHealth. However, there are contributions brought by innovation which are intangible and sundry, and thus are difficult to identify, measure and manage. A model presented by Vimarlund & Koch (2011) aims for identifying the benefits that IT investments bring to health and social care organizations. It could be used as a tool that identifies and classifies the effects and indicators of IT innovation in-vestments at different organizational levels for different stakeholders.

Purpose and research questions: This is an evaluative study with the purpose to validate Vimarlund & Koch’s (2011) evaluation model through practical application. A care study of EIAS (ERAS Interactive Audit System) is conducted. ERAS stands for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, which is an innovative process aims to enhance patient’s outcome after ma-jor surgery. EIAS is a system that supports the ERAS process. The aim is to achieve a deep understanding of IT investment evaluation. The model will be used in a real case as a guide to evaluate and identify impact that derives from the use and implementation of IT applica-tions. The process of evaluation could also be seen as a process of validation of the model in terms of comprehensiveness, practicality and applicability. Through this study, we aim to find out:

1) What are the possible contributions that EIAS brings to Jönköping County Council?

2) How is the performance of Vimarlund & Koch’s (2011) evaluation model in practical application, in terms of comprehensiveness, practicality and applicability?

Method: The purpose of this study is evaluative and it is conducted by using adductive ap-proach. Single case study will be adopted as the research strategy. In this study, qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interview with key respondents. The data collected will be analyzed qualitatively with a narrative approach.

Conclusion: Guided by Vimarlund & Koch’s (2011) evaluation model, the innovations that have been brought into healthcare organizations by EARS are electronic information supply, internal integration of clinical information and possibilities to learn from the system. The model has been validated in terms of comprehensiveness, practicality and applicability. The evaluation model is a generic model to demonstrate the contribution of IT to innovation and change in health care. It could be used in both formative and summative assessment and as well as goal-free and goal-based evaluation. The issue of the productivity paradox has been noticed as some effects are not immediate after introducing of IT. User-participation or not could be considered as an important condition for the validity of the evaluation guided by the evaluation model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 103 p.
Keyword [en]
eHealth, Health informatics, IT investment evaluation, Validation of Model, Effect of eHealth, Impact of eHealth, Contribution of eHealth, Model performance, Comprehensiveness, Practicality, Applicability
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-20119OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-20119DiVA: diva2:579109
Subject / course
IHH, Informatics
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2013-01-04 Created: 2012-12-19 Last updated: 2013-01-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Master_Thesis_30_ECTS_Lin_&_Ma(4981 kB)479 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4981 kBChecksum SHA-512
f8a1468885777bfbe8d1e07be628db89765440d4c80b3df5398620aa37b56f8d147f739b068045872cd5c8ea5d6e192396b1b07d1be4445441f0754dc5c38207
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lin, ChenMa, Jing
By organisation
JIBS, Business Informatics
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 479 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf