Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries: process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 12, 274- p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Patient safety is fundamental in high quality healthcare systems but despite an excellent record of perinatal care in Sweden some children still suffer from substandard care and unnecessary birth injuries. Sustainable patient safety improvements assume changes in key actors' mental models, norms and culture as well as in the tools, design and organisation of work. Interventions positively affecting team mental models on safety issues are a first step to enhancing change. Our purpose was to study a national intervention programme for the prevention of birth injuries with the aim to elucidate how the main interventions of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and written agreement for change affected the teams and their mental model of patient safety, and thereby their readiness for change. Knowledge of relevant considerations before implementing this type of patient safety intervention series could thereby be increased. Methods: Eighty participants in twenty-seven maternity units were interviewed after the first intervention sequence of the programme. A content analysis using a priori coding was performed in order to relate results to the anticipated outcomes of three basic interventions: self-assessment, peer review and written feedback, and agreement for change. Results: The self-assessment procedure was valuable and served as a useful tool for elucidating strengths and weaknesses and identifying areas for improvement for a safer delivery in maternity units. The peer-review intervention was appreciated, despite it being of less value when considering the contribution to explicit outcome effects (i.e. new input to team mental models and new suggestions for actions). The feedback report and the mutual agreement on measures for improvements reached when signing the contract seemed exert positive pressures for change. Conclusions: Our findings are in line with several studies stressing the importance of self-evaluation by encouraging a thorough review of objectives, practices and outcomes for the continuous improvement of an organisation. Even though effects of the peer review were limited, feedback from peers, or other change agents involved, and the support that a clear and well-structured action plan can provide are considered to be two important complements to future self-assessment procedures related to patient safety improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 12, 274- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-187260DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-274ISI: 000310146300001OAI: diva2:574118
Available from: 2012-12-04 Created: 2012-12-04 Last updated: 2012-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(581 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 581 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Högberg, Ulf
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 190 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link