Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A Multiform Desire: A Study of Appetite in Plato’s Timaeus, Republic and Phaedrus
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Logic and Metaphysics.
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation is a study of appetite in Plato’s Timaeus, Republic and Phaedrus. In recent research is it often suggested that Plato considers appetite (i) to pertain to the essential needs of the body, (ii) to relate to a distinct set of objects, e.g. food or drink, and (iii) to cause behaviour aiming at sensory pleasure. Exploring how the notion of appetite, directly and indirectly, connects with Plato’s other purposes in these dialogues, this dissertation sets out to evaluate these ideas. By asking, and answering, three philosophically and interpretatively crucial questions, individually linked to the arguments of the dialogues, this thesis aims to show (i) that the relationship between appetite and the body is not a matter of survival, and that appetite is better understood in terms of excess; (ii) that appetite is multiform and cannot be defined in terms of a distinct set of objects; and (iii) that appetite, in Plato, can also pertain to non-sensory objects, such as articulated discourse.

Chapter one asks what the universe can teach us about embodied life. It argues that Plato, in the Timaeus, works with an important link between the universe and the soul, and that the account of disorder, irrationality and multiformity identifying a pre-cosmic condition of the universe provides a key to understanding the excessive behaviour and condition of a soul dominated by appetite.

Chapter two asks why the philosophers of the Republic’s Kallipolis return to the cave, and suggests that Plato’s notion of the noble lie provides a reasonable account of this. By exploring the Republic’s ideas of education, poetry and tradition, it argues that appetite – a multiform and appearance oriented source of motivation – is an essential part of this account.

Chapter three asks why Socrates characterizes the speeches of the Phaedrus as deceptive games. It proposes that this question should be understood in the light of two distinctions: one between playful and serious discourse and one between simple and multiform. It argues that the speeches of the Phaedrus are multiform games, and suggests that appetite is the primary source of motivation of the soul addressed, personified by Phaedrus.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Filosofiska institutionen , 2013. , 242 p.
Keyword [en]
Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy, Plato, Appetite, Desire, Epithymia, Soul, Tripartition, Multiform, Poikilos, Timaeus, Republic, Phaedrus, Embodiment, Incarnation, Necessity, Philosopher-kings, Allegory of the Cave, Noble Lie, Poetry, Multi-headed Beast, Game, Play, Rhetoric, Dialectic, Deception.
National Category
Humanities Philosophy
Research subject
Theoretical Philosophy
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-186130ISBN: 978-91-506-2325-3OAI: diva2:572632
Public defence
2013-01-23, Universitetshuset, Sal IV, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, 13:15 (English)
Available from: 2012-12-20 Created: 2012-11-28 Last updated: 2012-12-20

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1596 kB)579 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1596 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Olof
By organisation
Logic and Metaphysics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 579 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 605 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link