Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Life Cycle Assessment of an Active House: Sustainability concepts by integrating energy, environment and well-being
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering.
2012 (English)MasteroppgaveStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

An emerging interest in constructing ultra low energy buildings, with low impact materials and maximizing the potential of using renewable energy reflects the potential in building industry to significantly contribute towards reducing environmental impacts. Life cycle assessments of the different green building prototypes provide a means to estimate the impacts of such buildings as well as provide suggestive improvements. The Active house in Stjørdal, Norway is one such prototype of a green building. This is a single family residence which is built with a concept of solar architecture in ultra low-energy buildings. It is challenging to harness solar energy at high latitudes. The Active house uses the fundamental construction details for a Passive house as mentioned in Norwegian regulatory standard, with specific changes in increasing the glazed surface to promote passive solar heat gain as well as increase daylighting , but also making it vulnerable to heat loss. The house is based on timber framework. Apart from electricity the house uses solar collectors which are connected to the hot water storage and hydronic floor heating. Space heating is also compensated by use of wood stoves. In the LCA results suggest that, based on the construction the Active house requires ten percent more energy than an equivalent Passive house which uses only electricity and wood. However, due to the effectivity of the solar collectors, it compensates for the need of the extra energy and in a lifetime of 60 years, it performs 15 % better , contributing to lesser environmental impacts than an equivalent Passive house. It is understood that extra embodied energy does not affect the environmental performance of a building if it results in better environmental performance (1). However, it is important to create demonstrable value of the building for the end user. Lifecycle assessment results from simulated operational use carries considerable error with respect to how the building actually performs. The results in this study have also been estimated with an approximate error factor derived from previous studies (2). There is a necessity to make every stakeholder of the building participative in the functioning of the building, inclusive of the end user, and maintaining the well-being. The case has also been scored in the basic categories of a sustainibility certification, with the results available from the lifecycle assessment and energy simulation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutt for bygg, anlegg og transport , 2012. , 95 p.
Keyword [no]
ntnudaim:8068, MSINDECOL Industriell Økologi, Environmental Systems Analysis
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-19316Local ID: ntnudaim:8068OAI: diva2:567016
Available from: 2012-11-11 Created: 2012-11-10 Last updated: 2013-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4569 kB)686 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4569 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
cover(184 kB)26 downloads
File information
File name COVER01.pdfFile size 184 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type coverMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Civil and Transport Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 686 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 244 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link