Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
MCTF and JPEG 2000 Based Wavelet Video Coding Compared to the Future HEVC Standard
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications.
2012 (English)MasteroppgaveStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Video and multimedia content has over the years become an important part of our everyday life. At the same time, the technology available to consumers has become more and more advanced. These technologies, such as streaming services and advanced displays, has enabled us to watch video content on a large variety of devices, from small, battery powered mobile phones to large TV-sets. Streaming of video over the Internet is a technology that is getting increasingly popular. As bandwidth is a limited resource, efficient compression techniques are clearly needed. The wide variety of devices capable of streaming and displaying video suggest a need for scalable video coders, as different devices might support different sets of resolutions and frame rates. As a response to the demands for efficient coding standards, VCEG and MPEG are jointly developing an emerging video compression standard called High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). The goal for this standard is to improve the coding efficiency as compared to H.264, without affecting image quality. A scalable video coding extension to HEVC is also planned to be developed. HEVC is based on the classic hybrid coding approach. This however, is not the only way to compress video, and attention is given to wavelet coders in the literature. JPEG 2000 is a wavelet image coder that offers spatial and quality scalability. Combining JPEG 2000 with Motion Compensated Temporal Filtering (MCTF) gives a wavelet video coder which offers both temporal, spatial and quality scalability, without the need for complex extensions. In this thesis, a wavelet video coder based on the combination of MCTF and JPEG 2000 was implemented. This coder was compared to HEVC by performing objective and subjective assessments, with the use case being streaming of video with a typical consumer broadband connection. The objective assessment showed that HEVC was the superior system in terms of both PSNR and SSIM. The subjective assessment revealed that observers preferred the distortion produced by HEVC over the proposed system. However, the results also indicated that improvements to the proposed system can be made that could possibly enhance the objective and subjective quality. In addition, indications were also found that suggest that a use case operating with higher bit rates is more suitable for the proposed system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutt for elektronikk og telekommunikasjon , 2012. , 120 p.
Keyword [no]
ntnudaim:7900, MTKOM kommunikasjonsteknologi, Lyd- og bildebehandling
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-18822Local ID: ntnudaim:7900OAI: diva2:566296
Available from: 2012-11-08 Created: 2012-11-08

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(9214 kB)917 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 9214 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
cover(184 kB)27 downloads
File information
File name COVER01.pdfFile size 184 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type coverMimetype application/pdf
attachment(1980 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.zipFile size 1980 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type attachmentMimetype application/zip

By organisation
Department of Electronics and Telecommunications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 917 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 75 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link