Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How do we know the energy use when producing biomaterials or biofuels? [Eco-Tech'12]
Chalmers University of Technology. (Environmental Systems Analysis)
Chalmers University of Technology. (Environmental Systems Analysis)
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Engineering and Sustainable Development. (Ecotechnology)
Chalmers University of Technology. (Chemical Environmental Science)
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Proceedings of ECO-TECH 2012, 26-28 November, Kalmar, Sweden., 2012Conference paper, Poster (with or without abstract) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

How much fossil energy that is used in the production of biomaterials or biofuels (e.g. fuel used in harvesting) is a parameter of obvious interest when optimizing the production systems. To use more fossil fuels in the production of a biofuel than what will be available as the biofuel product is obviously a bad idea. With increasing interest in biomaterials and biofuels, a shift from a sole focus on fossil energy will be necessary. Optimized use of energy over the whole life cycle is one important parameter to ensure sustainability. However, to report and interpret values on life cycle energy use is not as straight forward as what might immediately be perceived. The impact category ‘energy use’ is frequently used but is generally not applied in a transparent and consistent way between different studies. Considering the increased focus on biofuels, it is important to inform companies and policy-makers about the energy use of biofuels in relevant and transparent ways with well-defined indicators. The present situation in how energy use indicators are applied was studied in a set of LCA studies of biofuels. It was found that the choice of indicator was seldom motivated or discussed in the examined reports and articles, and five inherently different energy use indicators were observed: (1) fossil energy, (2) secondary energy, (3) cumulative energy demand (primary energy), (4) net energy balance, and (5) total extracted energy. As a test, we applied these five energy use indicators to the same cradle-to-gate production system and they give considerably different output numbers of energy use. This in itself is not unexpected, but indicates the importance of clearly identifying, describing and motivating the choice of energy use indicator. Direct comparisons between different energy use results could lead to misinformed policy decisions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Keyword [en]
fossil energy, secondary energy, cumulative energy demand, primary energy, net energy balance, total extracted energy
National Category
Environmental Engineering Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-17308OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-17308DiVA: diva2:564563
Conference
Linnaeus ECO-TECH 2012, 26-28 November, Kalmar, Sweden.
Available from: 2012-11-02 Created: 2012-11-02 Last updated: 2012-11-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(16 kB)207 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 16 kBChecksum SHA-512
8aa01f806d57fd5ee194262c05add3340da0e31f3e3c7c637a1a277d8943674e5cd8908fa4308047ff8e34f14aa07a4cdb152ed8eb2df6fd7feec5f96af18d43
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fröling, Morgan
By organisation
Department of Engineering and Sustainable Development
Environmental EngineeringEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 207 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 644 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf