Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-lifecare—a cross-sectional study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology. (lisa.martinsson@onkologi.umu.se)
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 2, no 4, e001328Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Structured methods to assess and support improvement in the quality of end-of-life care are lacking and need to be developed. This need is particularly high outside the specialised palliative care. This study examines whether participation in a national quality register increased the quality of end-of-life care.

DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional longitudinal register study.

SETTING: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) collects data about end-of-life care for deaths in all types of healthcare units all over Sweden. Data from all 503 healthcare units that had reported patients continuously to the register during a 3-year period were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on provided care during the last weeks of life were compared year-by-year with logistic regression.

PARTICIPANTS: The study included a total 30 283 patients. The gender distribution was 54% women and 46% men. A total of 60% of patients in the study had a cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS: Provided end-of-life care improved in a number of ways. The prevalence of six examined symptoms decreased. The prescription of 'as needed' medications for pain, nausea, anxiety and death rattle increased. A higher proportion of patients died in their place of preference. The patient's next of kin was more often offered a follow-up appointment after the patient's death. No changes were seen with respect to providing information to the patient or next of kin.

CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a national quality register covariates with quality improvements in end-of-life care over time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 2, no 4, e001328
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-60750DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001328ISI: 000315049300086PubMedID: 22936818OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-60750DiVA: diva2:562549
Available from: 2012-10-25 Created: 2012-10-25 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Quality improvement in palliative care: the role of a national quality register and perceptions of information during palliative chemotherapy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Quality improvement in palliative care: the role of a national quality register and perceptions of information during palliative chemotherapy
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Introduction

There is a need in palliative care for development of structured methods to assess quality and support improvement. This need is present both within and outside specialised palliative care.

Honest information from physicians is regarded as an important part of palliative care. Information about the transition to end-of-life care (ITEOL), conveyed by physicians to patients, has also been described as a ‘breakpoint conversation’.

Quality registers enable monitoring and improvement of quality of care, and clinical research. The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) is a Swedish national quality register that collects data from hospitals, hospices, nursing homes and home care, with an end-of-life questionnaire (ELQ) about palliative care content focusing on the last week of life.

Aims

Study I – The aim was to examine the validity of the ELQ from the SRPC.

Study II – The aim was to examine whether participation in the SRPC increases the quality of palliative care over a three-year period regarding eight items in the ELQ.

Study III – The aim was to examine whether an educational intervention for physicians and nurses in nursing homes and hospitals increases the proportion of patients who receive ITEOL.

Study IV – The aim was to describe how patients with cancer perceive the information they receive from physicians during palliative chemotherapy.

Methods

Study I – Data from 100 medical records and data from the paper versions of the ELQ filled in at a specialised palliative unit were compared with data reported to the SRPC.

Study II – Data from eight items in the ELQ reported to the SRPC from all healthcare units that had reported patients continuously during a three-year period were compared year-by-year with logistic regression.

Study III – Two municipalities (in charge of nursing homes) and two hospitals were randomised to receive an interactive half-day course about ITEOL for physicians and nurses. Four hospitals and four municipalities were assigned matched controls. The proportion of patients who received ITEOL before and after the intervention was measured with the ELQ. The effect of the intervention was analysed with a multivariable logistic regression model.

Study IV – Fifteen semi-structured interviews with patients with incurable cancer were conducted, transcribed verbatim and analysed with qualitative content analysis.

Results

Study I – The questions in the ELQ showed a congruity of 22% to 100% when comparing data from medical records with data reported to the SRPC. Eight questions fell below 80%. The paper versions filled in at the unit and the data reported to the SRPC showed a congruity of between 91% and 100%.

Study II – The prevalence of six symptoms decreased. The prescription of PRN (pro re nata – ‘as needed’) medications for pain, nausea, anxiety and death rattle increased. A higher proportion of patients died in their place of preference. The patient’s next of kin was more often offered a follow-up appointment after the patient’s death. There was no change in the proportion of patients or next of kin who received ITEOL.

Study III – The proportion of patients in the intervention group who received ITEOL increased from 35.1% (during a six-month period before the intervention) to 42.0% (during a six-month period after the intervention). The proportion in the control group increased from 30.4% to 33.7%. The effect of the intervention was significant (p=0.005) in the multivariable model.

Study IV – Three categories were disclosed during the analytical process: ‘living with a death sentence’, ‘depending on chemotherapy’, and ‘living with uncertainty’.

Conclusions

A national quality register has the potential of contributing to quality improvement in palliative care. Study I showed varied validity in the ELQ, implying a need to modify the questionnaire. Study II showed that participation in the SRPC was covariant with quality improvements in end-of-life care over time. Study III showed that more patients received ITEOL after an educative half-day intervention directed to physicians and nurses. Study IV showed that patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy perceived that their disease was incurable and deadly, and that conditions for future treatment and survival were uncertain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2015. 99 p.
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1696
Keyword
Cancer, chemotherapy, communication, end-of-life care, oncology, palliative care, palliative medicine, quality in healthcare, quality register
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Research subject
Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-102264 (URN)978-91-7601-219-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-05-22, Sal 135, byggnad 9a, Norrlands universitetssjukhus, Umeå, Umeå, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-30 Created: 2015-04-22 Last updated: 2015-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(251 kB)90 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 251 kBChecksum SHA-512
9dc7c1c0d76f47b689c66e1b98497657ae4edc937487e9a1fea1de031daf886631800051f17b7570000e0d2a6bf390c9fbc0791092ad821751b112fa6eba7ea1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martinsson, LisaNathanaelsson, LenaAxelsson, Bertil
By organisation
Oncology
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 90 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 181 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf