Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Liberalism, Altruism and Group Consent
Department of Philosophy, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
2009 (English)In: Public Health Ethics, ISSN 1754-9973, E-ISSN 1754-9981, Vol. 2, no 2, 146-157 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article first describes a dilemma for liberalism: On the one hand restricting their own options is an important means for groups of people to shape their lives. On the other hand, group members are typically divided over whether or not to accept option-restricting solutions or policies. Should we restrict the options of all members of a group even though some consent and some do not? This dilemma is particularly relevant to public health policy, which typically target groups of people with no possibility for individuals to opt out. The article then goes on to propose and discuss a series of aggregation rules for individual into group consent. Consideration of a number of scenarios shows that such rules cannot be formulated only in terms of fractions of consenters and non-consenters, but must incorporate their motives and how much they stand to win or lose. This raises further questions, including what is the appropriate impact of altruistic consenters and non-consenters, what should be the impact of costs and benefits and whether these should be understood as gross or net. All these issues are dealt with in a liberal, anti-paternalistic spirit, in order to explore whether group consent can contribute to the justification of option- restricting public health policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2009. Vol. 2, no 2, 146-157 p.
Keyword [en]
ANTI-PATERNALISM, COLLECTIVE SELF-REGULATION, COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY.
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-60691DOI: 10.1093/phe/php014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-60691DiVA: diva2:562259
Available from: 2012-12-05 Created: 2012-10-22 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

postprint(234 kB)154 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 234 kBChecksum SHA-512
744d8d05c5426859227e35d67fd293e53bf72f9928562688707fdf42b485c4767237cdae4db3f372dd8605767f9b3b14d5c3a6bbb9428fcdc9a966c91ffbe7ab
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grill, Kalle
In the same journal
Public Health Ethics
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 154 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 113 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf