Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
University of Gothenburg, The Sahlgrenska Academy.
University of Skövde, School of Life Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9771-6640
Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Patient Safety in Surgery, ISSN 1754-9493, Vol. 6, no 1, Article number 11- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Current knowledge suggests that, by applying evidence-based measures relating to the correct use of prophylactic antibiotics, perioperative normothermia, urinary tract catheterization and hand hygiene, important contributions can be made to reducing the risk of postoperative infections and device-related infections. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the application of intraoperative evidence-based measures, designed to reduce the risk of infection. In addition, we aimed to investigate whether the type of surgery, i.e. total joint arthroplasty compared with tibia and femur/hip fracture surgery, affected the use of protective measures.

Method: Data on the clinical application of evidence-based measures were collected structurally on site during 69 consecutively included operations involving fracture surgery (n = 35) and total joint arthroplasties (n = 34) using a pre-tested observation form. For observations in relation to hand disinfection, a modified version of the World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method was used.

Results: In all, only 29 patients (49%) of 59 received prophylaxis within the recommended time span. The differences in the timing of prophylactic antibiotics between total joint arthroplasty and fracture surgery were significant, i.e. a more accurate timing was implemented in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (p = 0.02). Eighteen (53%) of the patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty were actively treated with a forced-air warming system. The corresponding number for fracture surgery was 12 (34%) (p = 0.04).

Observations of 254 opportunities for hand hygiene revealed an overall adherence rate of 10.3% to hand disinfection guidelines.

Conclusions: The results showed that the utilization of evidence-based measures to reduce infections in clinical practice is not sufficient and there are unjustifiable differences in care depending on the type of surgery. The poor adherence to hand hygiene precautions in the operating room is a serious problem for patient safety and further studies should focus on resolving this problem. The WHO Safe Surgery checklist “time out” worked as an important reminder, but is not per se a guarantee of safety; it is the way we act in response to mistakes or lapses that finally matters.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2012. Vol. 6, no 1, Article number 11- p.
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Medical sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-6531DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-6-11PubMedID: 22697808ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84869052987OAI: diva2:560532
Available from: 2012-10-15 Created: 2012-10-15 Last updated: 2014-03-28

Open Access in DiVA

The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden(266 kB)348 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 266 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusLänk till fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergh, Ingrid
By organisation
School of Life Sciences
In the same journal
Patient Safety in Surgery
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 348 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 1080 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link