Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The comparison of the tool Parsifal with two mid-term planning tools for the electric production of isolated systems
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Electric Power Systems.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The tool Parsifal is a middle-term planning tool developed by the R&D department and the Operation Center. It is used operationally by various isolated systems at EDF, in particular EDF Land. It meets a need for optimization of the electrical power (thermal, hydraulic, markets) over a period of one year or two. Parsifal allows a precise modeling of the hydraulic system, taking into account the hydrological coupling between units lying in the same valley. The algorithm of stochastic dynamic programming of Parsifal handles uncertainty on the availability of the units, on the demand and on the hydrological inflows. However, this powerful – but old – tool is being challenged by new tools which are under study in this project. The aim of this work is to analyze the features of such tools for a potential replacement of Parsifal, that is considered as the reference tool since it has been used operationally for a couple of decades. The comparison has to be done based on the simulation results and on the user interface of the tools that are considered. The goal is to determine if the tool under study is able to provide results consistent with Parsifal and operationally usable by EDF in its production context. The production context that lies within the scope of this project is limited to isolated systems. This work should help OSIRIS to make its mind about the replacement of Parsifal by Tick-Tack, a middle-term optimization tool developed internally by EDF, or by SDDP, a Brazilian tool developed by the company PSR. According to the results of this study both tools get an operation policy that turns more expensive than Parsifal. This cost difference is due to the water management of the hydro resource that is less optimal in the tools compared with Parsifal. In Tick-Tack as in SDDP, the main reason for this difference is the handling of spillage in the case of wet inflow scenarios. However, both Tick-Tack and SDDP benefit from a user-friendly interface and a smaller calculation time than Parsifal. As a general result of this project, the tool Parsifal cannot be operationally replaced either by Tick-Tack or by SDDP. Indeed, although Tick-Tack and SDDP offer interesting features in terms of calculation time and graphical interface, they have not been designed in order to meet the specific needs of the operational production of isolated systems like Parsifal has. Consequently, Parsifal will remain the tool that is used for the electrical production middle-term planning of isolated systems in France. However, this study will be used as a basis for future studies that will go into deeper details. These studies may consider several unavailability scenarios instead of only one and add a spillage penalty that prevents the tools from unnecessary spillage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 62 p.
Series
EES Examensarbete / Master Thesis, XR-EE-ES 2012:009
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-103183OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-103183DiVA: diva2:558825
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Electrical Engineering
Uppsok
Technology
Examiners
Available from: 2012-10-10 Created: 2012-10-05 Last updated: 2012-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

FULLTEXT(1720 kB)252 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1720 kBChecksum SHA-512
f643a3c6f6407508113db7acc8f5c81aff894066a0f19b60804c48b4db1017393feb8f3a43dd40a48300e44c9839c68211d3820e15f62ed6da49af2294904d7d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Electric Power Systems
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 252 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 100 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf