Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Projektering av ett småhus samt ekonomisk jämförelse av värmesystem
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering.
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Design of a house requires knowledge of both technology and economics. Heating and ventilation shall be designed, costs are calculated and estimated and requirements must be fulfilled. Which heating system is to be elected is also a difficult choice, especially with rising energy prices as a factor.

The choice of energy system is not always given, because it depends on several factors. Below is a comparison between district heating, geothermal heat pump and electric boiler from an economic standpoint. In a previous report appears district heating and geothermal heat pump as the best options. The analysis in this work, district heating appears as the best system for projected house with an energy consumption of 10MWh.

An analysis is made by varying some factors in the economic calculations. With half the economic useful life of the systems, the geothermal heat pump is considerably more expensive than the electric boiler, which should be considered if new efficient heating system will enter the market. When energy consumption is reduced to 5MWh, electric boiler is cheaper than geothermal heat pump, set to annual annuities.

The conclusion is that the district heating is the best option for an energy consumption of 10 MWh, followed closely by geothermal heating. But energy consumption is very great influence which we ought to look out for, especially in the future with more energy-efficient building. This can get results to look different.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 104 p.
Keyword [sv]
Småhus, Projektering, Värmesystem
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102463OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-102463DiVA: diva2:552986
Subject / course
Built Environment
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Urban Management
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-10-01 Created: 2012-09-17 Last updated: 2012-10-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4224 kB)595 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4224 kBChecksum SHA-512
4035bc819df973993ae7cdb18f159969bdcda1e0756747a8cea9854a79854b27bfd2fb9b7969c7873f6fd08e3fdaeba81236642813875c3f0e086717c2d9e0be
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Civil and Architectural Engineering
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 595 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1657 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf