Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Life Cycle Assessments as a front-end Systems Engineering tool in ship design
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Naval Systems.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Miljömässiga livscykelanalyser som ett verktyg för systemarbetet i tidiga faser av fartygsprojektering (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

Environmental impact analyses have not been popular in ship design due to the complexity of both the analysis itself and the ship system. This study proposes a framework for life cycle assessments (LCA) for ship design, using a foundation in systems engineering to position the assessment method in the design process. By limiting the analysis to comparing the differences between design alternatives and accepting lower result precision, the effort and level of expertise required is significantly reduced. Reducing the requirement on precision allows for approximate input data as well, enabling the naval architect to use simple methods, e.g. the Holtrop-Mennen method, to provide input data. Despite this imprecision, it is shown that one can observe trends in the result that point toward a design concept with lower impact than its contestors. Further, one must select an evaluation model and database, both determined by experts, that support the analysis well, and a software to present the naval architect with an interface with which he can easily interact. The benefits of such simplified analyses are that little LCA expertise is required, only a few parameters must be modelled and most of the input data is determined, allbeit approximately, through the initial regular ship design process and is readily available. The pitfalls are a low degree of transparency due to the evaluation model and risk for misinterpretation and misuse of the results because of the limit on modelled parameters and assessment precision. Using this framework, with its limitations, lowers the threshold to implementing an LCA as a design review tool in early design stages, a front-end tool, allowing the environmental assessment to affect earlier design decisions in a greater extent than today.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 71 p.
Series
Trita-AVE, ISSN 1651-7660 ; 2012:49
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102049OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-102049DiVA: diva2:550524
Subject / course
Naval Systems
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2012-09-10 Created: 2012-09-07 Last updated: 2012-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2004 kB)702 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2004 kBChecksum SHA-512
5c232cf5ecb126af3383283a7ca83dfea20286ee629cca2316982c2d81c7cf19daa95817e6b8acba77a88f6e4243046f392db9bf2d93786c6ddacb58d93f4081
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Naval Systems
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 703 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 242 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf