Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The complexity of the audit process:: Judgment and decision making
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This paper explains what recognition the auditor has of theoretical judgment and decision making subjects surrounding the audit process. The auditors’ judgment and decision making skills seem to be more challenged when it comes to estimating their clients’ valuations. Therefore, the audit process of fair value measures (FVM) is used to charterer the recognition more clearly. Attention to this topic is warranted for several reasons. First, FVM was implemented on the Swedish market in 2005 and is relatively recent to Swedish auditors. Second, to our knowledge no similar study, regarding the Swedish audit firms, has been conducted within this area. Third, the evidence, drawn from previous research, of what recognition the auditors have of the theoretical judgment and decision making subjects seem to be more indirect than direct and we also extend the previous research. We find, through semi-structured interviews with employees of the ‘Big four’, that both judgment and decision making are acknowledged as possible issues. However, we also find that certain areas within these two categories are unrecognized to be of immediate concern.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 29 p.
Keyword [en]
Audit process; Judgment; Decision making; Management influence; Internal control; Overconfidence; Knowledge sharing; Fair value measures
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-180174OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-180174DiVA: diva2:548573
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2012-09-03 Created: 2012-08-31 Last updated: 2012-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(776 kB)604 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 776 kBChecksum SHA-512
a5435f493e44cd375851cec2d5bdada092d60144e79892dab0c998fe1377575ef8c152c62fbeae2c77c89effeff9ab084162092c4d600a79457b5e37d27c25ac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krisandersson, Patric
By organisation
Department of Business Studies
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 604 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 671 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf