Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experience of being a low priority patient during waiting time at an emergency department
Instituionen för vård och natur, Högskolan i Skövde. (Complications in the Reproductive Life of Women)
Institutionen för vård och natur, Högskolan i Skövde. (Complications in the Reproductive Life of Women)
(Complications in the Reproductive Life of Women)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2577-1632
2012 (English)In: Psychology Research and Behavior Management, ISSN 1179-1578, E-ISSN 1179-1578, Vol. 5, 1-9 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Work in the emergency department is characterized by fast and efficient medical efforts to save lives, but can also involve a long waiting time for patients. Patients are given a priority rating upon their arrival in the clinic based on the seriousness of their problem, and nursing care for lower priority patients is given a lower prioritization. Regardless of their medical prioritization, all patients have a right to expect good nursing care while they are waiting. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the experience of the low prioritized patient during their waiting time in the emergency department.

METHODS: A phenomenological hermeneutic research method was used to analyze an interview transcript. Data collection consisted of narrative interviews. The interviewees were 14 patients who had waited more than three hours for surgical, orthopedic, or other medical care.

RESULTS: The findings resulted in four different themes, ie, being dependent on care, being exposed, being vulnerable, and being secure. Lower priority patients are not paid as much attention by nursing staff. Patients reported feeling powerless, insulted, and humiliated when their care was delayed without their understanding what was happening to them. Not understanding results in exposure that violates self-esteem.

CONCLUSION: The goal of the health care provider must be to minimize and prevent suffering, prevent feelings of vulnerability, and to create conditions for optimal patient well being.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 5, 1-9 p.
National Category
Research subject
Caring sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-24673DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S27790PubMedID: 22334799OAI: diva2:546341
Empiriska studier i Skaraborg
Available from: 2013-03-22 Created: 2012-08-23 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(200 kB)