Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: The IPD-Work consortium
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 12, no 1, Art. no. 62- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Job strain (i.e., high job demands combined with low job control) is a frequently used indicator of harmful work stress, but studies have often used partial versions of the complete multi-item job demands and control scales. Understanding whether the different instruments assess the same underlying concepts has crucial implications for the interpretation of findings across studies, harmonisation of multi-cohort data for pooled analyses, and design of future studies. As part of the ’IPD-Work’ (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium, we compared different versions of the demands and control scales available in 17 European cohort studies. Methods. Six of the 17 studies had information on the complete scales and 11 on partial scales. Here, we analyse individual level data from 70 751 participants of the studies which had complete scales (5 demand items, 6 job control items). Results. We found high Pearson correlation coefficients between complete scales of job demands and control relative to scales with at least three items (r > 0.90) and for partial scales with two items only (r = 0.76-0.88). In comparison with scores from the complete scales, the agreement between job strain definitions was very good when only one item was missing in either the demands or the control scale (kappa > 0.80); good for job strain assessed with three demand items and all six control items (kappa > 0.68) and moderate to good when items were missing from both scales (kappa = 0.54-0.76). The sensitivity was > 0.80 when only one item was missing from either scale, decreasing when several items were missing in one or both job strain subscales. Conclusions. Partial job demand and job control scales with at least half of the items of the complete scales, and job strain indices based on one complete and one partial scale, seemed to assess the same underlying concepts as the complete survey instruments. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 12, no 1, Art. no. 62- p.
Keyword [en]
Agreement; Job control; Job demands; Job strain; Work stress
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-16743DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-62ISI: 000302912800001ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84856020686OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-16743DiVA: diva2:545424
Available from: 2012-08-20 Created: 2012-08-17 Last updated: 2016-10-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(234 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 234 kBChecksum SHA-512
e687a9ebed0cdd10d4620e67fdf9ffeab0896fa5fbd6d595aa3f7d9d3d8f275d92e094d01fcefe90fa41777fb995e9a69f89f02be0c9048360585085ce1c3fff
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Knutsson, Anders
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologyEnvironmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 40 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link