Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Seismic performance of a  bridge subjected to far-field  ground motions by a Mw 9.0  earthquake and near-field  ground motions by a Mw 6.9  earthquake
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Structural Engineering and Bridges.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In the last two decades, two major earthquakes have occurred in Japan: the 1995 Kobe earthquake and the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. In the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, many bridge structures were destroyed by the tsunamis, but it is interesting to study the ground motion induced damage and also how this earthquake differed from the one in 1995. In this thesis, the seismic response of a bridge designed according to the current Japanese Design Specifications was evaluated when it is subjected to near-field ground motions recorded during the 1995 Kobe earthquake and far-field ground motions recorded during the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. For this purpose, a series of nonlinear dynamic response analysis was conducted and the seismic performance of the bridge was verified in terms of its displacement and ductility demand.

It was found from the dynamic response analysis that the seismic response of the target bridge when subjected to the ground motions from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake was smaller than during the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Although the ground motions from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake were very strong, they were not as strong as the ground motions from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. The results obtained in this thesis clarify the validity of the Type I and Type II design ground motions. The target bridge used in this thesis was designed according to the post-1990 design specifications and showed limited nonlinear response when subjected to the different ground motions which shows how efficient the enhancement of the seismic performance of bridges has been since the 1990’s.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Series
Trita-BKN-Examensarbete, ISSN 1103-4297 ; 358
Keyword [en]
seismic performance, dynamic response analysis, far-field ground motions, near-field ground motions
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-99380ISRN: KTH/BKN/EX-358-SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-99380DiVA: diva2:542058
Subject / course
Structural Design and Bridges
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Urban Management
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-09-05 Created: 2012-07-29 Last updated: 2012-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4641 kB)3222 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4641 kBChecksum SHA-512
64b573041edcd95633c52b1a0e3426393df18262b325863019d5827bb82545c9d622ac8b3470e657d5011b78c698eade1f088fd3ae3e26b9bf956e2db2f25496
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Structural Engineering and Bridges
Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3222 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 408 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf