Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A potential for further enhancing obstetrical safety: Patient harm measurement with the global trigger tool in the south-east health-care region of Sweden
Jönköping University, School of Health Science, HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and Welfare. Jönköping University, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

A decade of heightened awareness concerning safety issues in healthcare since the Institute of Medicine’s awakening call has resulted in a string of counteroffensive measures. The pace of improvement has been slow and not altogether clear. Rates of patient harm are in general now measured by voluntary reporting and indicator measurements. The use of triggers or clues in random nurse-based reviews to enable identification of patient harm is a more effective method for measuring the overall rate of harm in a health care organisation. Measured actual overall rates of patient harm, their variations and patterns during delivery in the south-east health-care region of Sweden are not previously known. Measurement is important to patient safety improvement, as a foundation for accountability, effort selection and keeping track of results. The patient’s voice must also be much clearer in quality and safety improvement efforts in healthcare. The Institute of Healthcare Improvements Global Trigger Tool for measuring adverse events was used to review 1137 deliveries during 2011 in the seven departments (10% of all cases). Mother and new-born were both evaluated. Thirty eight patient harm events per 1000 patient days were identified, correlating to 13% of admissions. Presupposed rates among staff were double this value. Current patient safety indicators are half this value. One third of patient harm events at birth affected the new-born. Twenty different categories of harm were found. This study shows significantly higher rates of patient harm than previously reported. The nurse reviewers defined the method as valuable and a useful method for measuring harm at delivery. Limitations at this stage are no observed changes in health care delivery or clinical outcomes and that value assessment is based entirely on the judgement of the data-abstractors.


Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 30 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality Improvement, Global Trigger Tool, Patient Safety, Obstetric Care
National Category
Other Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-19073OAI: diva2:541860
Available from: 2012-09-10 Created: 2012-07-25 Last updated: 2012-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(497 kB)226 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 497 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
HHJ, Quality Improvement and Leadership in Health and WelfareThe Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 226 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 170 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link