Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Angelägna allmänna intressen: En begränsning av möjligheten att genomföra kommersiellexpropriation?
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Commercial Law.
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Commercial expropriation occurs when real property is compulsory acquired by a private operator. This phenomenon is relatively new and has been criticized not only because of the rules concerning compensation, but also from the point of view of permissibility.

An intervention in the protection of property must fulfill the requirement of important public interest set out in RF 2 kap. 15 § in order for it to be allowed. There is no definition regarding what constitutes an important public interest, the only thing that exist is a non-exhaustive list in the preparatory work. This in turn has led to the creation of a broad discretion when it comes to determining what constitutes important public interests. The broad discretion is making it difficult for the courts to reject interventions due to the vague meaning of the requirement.

Commercial expropriations are not exempted from the difficulty of determining the meaning of important public interests. What makes commercial expropriation controversial is the fact that it occurs under the same rules that govern communi-ty expropriation, although private operators are driven by profit motives. The problem is the fact that the requirement does not limit the possibilities of making interventions in the protection of property. The necessity of having a requirement without meaning that should limit the possibilities of making interventions can be questioned. The possibility of making all or nothing fit under the requirement can affect legal certainty in a negative way, because it becomes difficult to predict the reasons that may justify expropriation.

In order for the requirement to work as a limitation, there must be a clarification concerning its meaning. A first step in that direction is to introduce a clarification in the preparatory work which would render the courts able to determine if the requirement is fulfilled.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Keyword [sv]
angelägna allmänna intressen, kommersiell expropriation
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-18864OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-18864DiVA: diva2:538976
Subject / course
IHH, Commercial Law
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-07-06 Created: 2012-07-02 Last updated: 2012-07-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Angelägna allmänna intressen(915 kB)725 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 915 kBChecksum SHA-512
b19ced317e64591c8e39def7f85914b87f8cb12c4ae2f35bcac51d638b8b268ea784bc223b81f37e74ff4cf776478543d13ea2aaf2efa7f914eb96ade8ed19c7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Commercial Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 725 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 139 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf