Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Globalization Now and Later. A Study of Interactive Argumentation among EFL Learners
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

People usually commence an argument in hope for persuading the other party. These arguments can be a part of their job or personal life, which may influence the life of people around them or sometimes in case of a political debate, can affect lives of millions of people. The situation can get more challenging if the argument is produced in a language other than someone's mother tongue and in this respect, language proficiency can be of great value to them. One of the most important goals of language teaching classes is to teach the students of foreign languages how to develop information processes in order to express themselves. In the present study, the performance of seven students who study English in a private language school in Iran, is analyzed in a debate on 'globalization'. These Farsi speaking learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) used some collaborative and individual strategies in the process of interactive argumentation. It can be said that this debate met the requirements of a 'pro et contra' (for and against) argument mentioned by Naess (2005). The views that are in favor of the debate's subject are mentioned as well as the views against it. It does not seem to have a conclusion and the views were not weighed against each other, they were merely introduced and both sides were indicated. This mainly took place due to of lack of time to consider all the aspects of the arguments. Therefore, it can be maintained that the result of this argumentation was 'globalization now and later'. According to Hirsch's 'minimal model of ideal interactive argumentation', this may seem to be a terrible situation, but in fact it is "a very realistic assumption to make about argumentation as an on-going interactive enterprise" (1987: 440).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 60 p.
National Category
Languages and Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79181ISRN: LIU-IKK/MPLCE-A--12/04--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-79181DiVA: diva2:538914
Subject / course
Master's Programme in Language and Culture in Europe
Presentation
2012-06-12, 13:00 (English)
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-08-24 Created: 2012-07-02 Last updated: 2012-08-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Globalization Now and Later. A Study of Interactive Argumentation among EFL Learners(714 kB)653 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 714 kBChecksum SHA-512
b93091dacd664895abff9f40647b995f5b109a70035039f6beefb4ea127fc90c3d2a37cd124ca680bb3c44f28628463075940214a36cc323335cbc86b4bb965a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Afzali, Parichehr
By organisation
Department of Culture and CommunicationFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 653 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1107 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf