Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparisons of Sculpting Efficiency Between Mudbox and ZBrush
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

It is difficult to navigate throughout todays existing sculpting and modeling software. Industry drives the development in this area by “time versus quality.” It is difficult to know which software is the most suitable to learn for sculpting details, as well as which one is the most efficient for beginners. There are two software programs, Autodesk Mudbox and Pixologic ZBrush, which will be examined and reviewed for sculpting details, learning curve for beginners, and time efficiency in this research. The overall results displayed that ZBrush seems to be the better choice for more advanced modellers and artists, while Mudbox is a better choice for beginners and more technical modellers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 28 p.
Keyword [en]
Sculpting, modeling, 3D, 2.5D, base mesh, Autodesk Mudbox, Pixologic ZBrush.
National Category
Computer Science
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-12231OAI: diva2:536274
Subject / course
Computer science
Educational program
Creative computer graphics
Available from: 2012-06-27 Created: 2012-06-21 Last updated: 2012-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1053 kB)863 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1053 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management
Computer Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 863 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 246 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link