Comparisons of Sculpting Efficiency Between Mudbox and ZBrush
Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
It is difficult to navigate throughout todays existing sculpting and modeling software. Industry drives the development in this area by “time versus quality.” It is difficult to know which software is the most suitable to learn for sculpting details, as well as which one is the most efficient for beginners. There are two software programs, Autodesk Mudbox and Pixologic ZBrush, which will be examined and reviewed for sculpting details, learning curve for beginners, and time efficiency in this research. The overall results displayed that ZBrush seems to be the better choice for more advanced modellers and artists, while Mudbox is a better choice for beginners and more technical modellers.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 28 p.
Sculpting, modeling, 3D, 2.5D, base mesh, Autodesk Mudbox, Pixologic ZBrush.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-12231OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-12231DiVA: diva2:536274
Subject / course
Creative computer graphics