Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En kvalitetsbedömning av några av flygvapnets kravunderlag
Swedish National Defence College.
2012 (Swedish)Student paper other, 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Uppsatsen undersöker inledningsvis om FOI:s principer för kravformulering kan anses behöva kompletteras mot bakgrund av Försvarsmaktens behov och undersöker därefter kvalitén i några av flygvapnets kravunderlag relativt principerna för kravformulering. Av resultatet framgår att principerna kan behöva kompletteras med principerna prioritering och kontextuell beskrivning. Av fallstudiernas resultat framgår att kvalitén i flygvapnets kravunderlag relativt principerna för kravformulering generellt är låg, att den varierar mellan underlagen och att den i vissa fall är mycket låg i fråga om uppfyllnad av principerna. Uppsatsen rekommenderar att FOI:s principer för kravformulering utökas med principerna prioritering och kontextuell beskrivning. Vidare rekommenderas flygvapnet att öka kvalitén i framtida kravformuleringarna så att den militära nyttan av arbete med kravformulering även kan öka. Slutligen och som biprodukt visas hur ett bör-krav kan användas i ett kravunderlag på ett annat sätt än det som har varit Försvarsmaktens tradition.

Abstract [en]

The paper firstly examines if the FOI principles for formulating requirements need to be complemented as a result of the Armed Forces needs and then examines the quality of some of the Air Force requirements documents relative to the principles of requirements formulation. The results show that the principles can be complemented by the principles of priority and contextual description. The case studies results show that the quality of the air force's requirements documentation relative to the principles is generally low, that it varies between the documents and that they in some cases are very low in terms of fulfilling the principles. The paper recommends that the FOI principles for formulating requirements are complemented with the principles of priority and contextual description. It recommends the Air Force to improve the quality of future requirement formulations so that the military utility of such work also may increase. Finally, as a spin-off product, it shows how a should-requirement can be used in a different way than what has been the Armed Forces tradition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 59 p.
Keyword [en]
Requirements engineering, formulating requirements, requirements, Air Force, equipment, system
Keyword [sv]
Kravhantering, kravformulering, krav, flygvapnet, materiel, system, militärteknik
National Category
Engineering and Technology Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-2675OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-2675DiVA: diva2:535854
Subject / course
Militärteknik, självständigt arbete
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2012-06-20 Created: 2012-06-20 Last updated: 2012-06-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(698 kB)558 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 698 kBChecksum SHA-512
241d5f617936b8eb60e736f32a9efa4c1409453a5b0d205eef5700349d53727883dff08aeca4b80d9efe7c6464773ba84a850f27af784cb54a85109e5bcec15b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Swedish National Defence College
Engineering and TechnologyOther Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 558 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 207 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf