Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Will the conflict concerning the Human Terrain System continue?
Swedish National Defence College.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Human Terrain System has been describes as: “Not since World War II has a military consulting been endorsed so publicly; not since Vietnam had it been condemned so fiercely.”

The purpose of this essay is to describe what the controversy and the critique presented against HTS consists off and to see if there is a beginning to a solution in some way.

HTS is embedding socials scientists within military deployed units and it is argued to violate the ethic codes of research. Pauline Kusiak has presented a solution to the conflict. By analysing the arguments in the public debate between the anthropologists against and HTS’s advocates the purpose is to answer if the U.S. Military recognise the tensions between anthropology methods and their embedding in HTS? To measure ‘recognition’ the model of ‘The Feedback Stair’ is used. The answer is that the tension is not recognised and it supports the hypothesis that the U.S. Military are not at the first step one the solution presented by Kusiak to diminish ‘the civilian-military gap.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 58 p.
Keyword [en]
HTS, Human Terrain System, Human Terrain Teams, Anthropology’s ethic code
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-2667OAI: diva2:535240
Educational program
Officersprogrammet (OP)
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Available from: 2012-06-19 Created: 2012-06-19 Last updated: 2013-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(387 kB)