Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why is there no relationship between ownership concentration and performance in Sweden?
Kristianstad University, Department of Business Administration.
2002 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Ever since Adam Smith there has been a contention that dispersed ownership in a joint stock company is accompanied by low firm performance. This belief has reached its theoretical hights in agency theory. The aim of the paper is to show that mthe contention has to be developed in order to be more attuned with empirical data. It will be argued 1.) That the influence of ownership structure upon performance is mediated through mechanisms inside the firm, the strategy being the most prominent; 2.) That performance has to be divided into profit and risk, and into firm performance, using accounting data, and market performance, using share market performance data; 3.) That the ownership structure is not exclusively a factor that influences the firm, but that the firm and its strategy influence the ownership structure through attracting certain shareholders and repulse others; 4.) That ownership structure is but one mechanism of several corporate governance mechanisms and that performance is ultimately influenced by the mix of the mechanisms; and 5.) Those institutional differences, such as culture, traditions, legislation and history, influence the opportunity set of corporate governance structures and therefore the relative importance of ownership structures in influencing the performance of the firm. A data set from Sweden and from the hard years of 1990 is used in order to empirically support the statements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kristianstad: Department of Business Studies, Kristianstad University College , 2002. , 38 p.
Series
Working paper series, ISSN 1650-0636 ; 2002:2
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9434OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9434DiVA: diva2:535176
Available from: 2012-06-19 Created: 2012-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(115 kB)121 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 115 kBChecksum SHA-512
6b74973a59868a1ff121a465f1964268d09c2c47cd6f35a843ce9377bf73c7343a32da49f52ddd25010b31d61ef22bdb0e42d3aa4be1cb2d5bf38d766ca39d9d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 121 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf