Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do comparisons of performance measures give misleading information?: the case of the Swedish water and sewage sector
Kristianstad University, Department of Business Administration.
2003 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In recent years interest in benchmarking and comparisons of performance measures has increased mong Swedish municipalities. Comparisons of performance measures are used for different urposes. They are used in benchmarking processes, with the aim not only of improving perations but also of providing standards in the context of accountability. Regardless of the urpose of the comparisons of performance measures, it is important that the compared measures re defined and applied homogeneously and consistently, i.e. they must have information orrespondence in order to be comparable; otherwise, erroneous decisions can be made. owever, commensurability is not enough. If the compared measures are to have any information alue, the measures also need to be chosen carefully, so that, in a relevant and reliable way, they eflect the measured objects’ most important qualities. This paper analyses performance easures used in three benchmarking projects in the Swedish water and sewage sector. The easures are analysed in the light of how well they reflect the measured objects’ most important ualities, their relevance, commensurability, and reliability. The findings are distressing; the ppropriateness of the performance measures in these three projects must be strongly questioned. n particular, the measures were too aggregated as to capture, reproduce, and describe the most mportant qualities of the measured objects in a relevant way. As for commensurability, it was so oor that one is entitled to sk hether the comparisons are not doing more harm than good.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kristianstad: Department of Business Studies, Kristianstad University College , 2003. , 23 p.
Series
Working paper series, ISSN 1650-0636 ; 2003:3
Keyword [en]
accountability, benchmarking, comparisons, commensurability, performance measures, reliability
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9429DiVA: diva2:535158
Available from: 2012-06-19 Created: 2012-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(77 kB)134 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 77 kBChecksum SHA-512
d14482c1f56f0117c412a1c54514053021809709330ffb8b742bfd6e37e96e904fd2ab79861f56bbd8216881804bae8491b97ec8bc98d583fb2569e22a1b44bb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 134 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf