Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the idealized institutional evolution of organizational forms
Kristianstad University, Department of Business Administration. (Avdelningen för Ekonomi)
2003 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Several researchers analyse organisational forms as an idealised historical evolution were new organisational forms builds on earlier established forms. These idealised theoretical approaches have the advantages of creating an overall understanding of the variety of organisations that can be observed at a given time. They also explain this variety with a simple evolutionary logic: New organisational innovations occur in established forms. If they prove competitive they will be imitated and, with time, new forms will emerge.  Hereby organisational development is not only a question of situational fit, but also due to historical dependencies. Different contributions observe different forms and give different theoretical explanations. This paper suggests an extensive framework of different organisation forms and links this framework to an elaborated theoretical analysis based on new institutional economics and other fields of organisation theory. The theoretical analysis is based on the four co-coordination mechanisms authority, rules, price and ideology. The organisational development is analysed as a stepwise development where forms develop from one level to another with time and increased scale. At the first level the Simple hierarchy  and the Adhocratic form is identified. At a second level the U-form and the Professional form follows. At the third level, the M-form and H-form of large enterprises are identified. Finally, at a fourth level a new form, the W-form, is identified. The development is explained by identification of situational factors and by the use of different co-ordination mechanisms. As the idealised evolution continuous, more sophisticated forms develop which modify and extend the use the co-ordination mechanisms of earlier forms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kristianstad: Department of Business Studies, Kristianstad University College , 2003. , 19 p.
Series
Working paper series, ISSN 1650-0636 ; 2003:8
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9414OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9414DiVA: diva2:534794
Available from: 2012-06-18 Created: 2012-06-18 Last updated: 2012-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(75 kB)235 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 75 kBChecksum SHA-512
e84b603b8030af60006721e06b6b86ee8534e2aa86e69f2ca32d0be6b6fc40b068ad21161c562591e3fca2b85a88503d019f013638d43b7a7a25040492b63377
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pihl, Håkan
By organisation
Department of Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 235 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 123 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf