Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Europeisk medborgardialog?: En implementeringsstudie av Plan D som i demokrati,dialog och debatt
Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS).
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In an effort to strengthen democracy in the union, the EU in 2005 took a new approach to communications policy to reach out to the citizens. The strategic document "Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate" was accompanied by two other documents, and the three of them were the core of this policy. Both democracy and communications work means at EU level a higher complexity than in the nation-state arena. Objective of this study is to examine how the implementation of Plan D has turned out in a democracy renewal perspective. To achieve that answers are sought to questions concerning the goals of Plan D, how they are still present today, what happened in practice regarding the efforts that are highlighted, and how the substance of the activities can be judged from a democratic theory perspective. Implementation theory, communication theory and democratic theory are central elements in answering these questions. The study is divided into three analytical levels: European, national, regional and local level. The method used is thoroughly qualitative text analysis. At regional and local level, a comparative case study concentrates in two organizations involved in the implementation work. The empirical material used consists of documents related to Plan D, and partly the result of interviews with officials who work practically with communication. The study shows that the focus of communications work is not on citizen participation in decision-making, much of the work is all about information and that it is characterized with a classic view of communication. Given that it is considered that the studied implementation of Plan D is not about a European civil dialogue where participation in the decision making is a central part.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 52 p.
Keyword [en]
EU, communication, democracy, implementation
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-17895OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-17895DiVA: diva2:532204
Subject / course
Political Science
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-06-19 Created: 2012-06-10 Last updated: 2012-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Europeisk medborgardialog?(557 kB)239 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 557 kBChecksum SHA-512
641ff1377803fa25d2aff2f8be26fa98b727341a12c8fed0747dd5ca7678d71aa69907b951e06b170df48bfeb6d583b519574502ce3eeadb6b847a9686a49e2d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS)
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 239 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 220 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf