Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Standard circumstances and vital goals: comments on Sridhar Venkatapuram’s critique
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Health and Society. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2013 (English)In: Bioethics, ISSN 0269-9702, E-ISSN 1467-8519, Vol. 27, no 5, 280-284 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article is a reply to Venkatapuram's critique in his article Health, Vital Goals, Capabilities, this volume. I take issue mainly with three critical points put forward by Venkatapuram with regard to my theory of health. (1) I deny that the contents of my vital goals are relative to each community or context, as Venkatapuram claims. There is no conceptual connection at all between standard circumstances and vital goals, as I understand these concepts. (2) Venkatapuram notes that I stop short of filling the framework of vital goals with any content and thereby make my concept of health less concrete. I reply that some vital goals are indeed universal, viz. the ones which are necessary conditions for survival. Many other vital goals are individual and cannot therefore be included in a universal list. (3) Venkatapuram claims that my definition of vital goals is too broad, since it entails that some persons without any disease can be regarded as ill. However, in my understanding health is a relational concept from a state of complete health to a state of maximal illness. In this framework, a minor reduction of a state of complete health does not entail illness. This article also contains a comparison between my theory of health and Martha Nussbaum's theory of capabilities for dignity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2013. Vol. 27, no 5, 280-284 p.
Keyword [en]
health, standard circumstances, vital goals, subjective preferences, capabilities, Nussbaum
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-77992DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01958.xISI: 000318932200008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-77992DiVA: diva2:530580
Available from: 2012-06-04 Created: 2012-06-04 Last updated: 2017-12-07

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(422 kB)341 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 422 kBChecksum SHA-512
816f7f780f0336670cca72a2d58cb4a3b3acde834dbc6ace4c46dca25a38f33280a544d666f45059dbb39c2f9aa31dbaf4d407c087e8b6bcc8b178e9167d8b8e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nordenfelt, Lennart

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordenfelt, Lennart
By organisation
Health and SocietyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Bioethics
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 341 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 231 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf