Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
From Anti-Natalist to Ultra-Conservative: Restricting Reproductive Choice in Peru
Center for Health and Gender Equity, Lima, Peru.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1975-9060
2004 (English)In: Reproductive health matters, ISSN 0968-8080, E-ISSN 1460-9576, Vol. 12, no 24, 56-69 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article examines Peru’s population policy since the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development and assesses to what extent its policies and programmes have affected reproductive health and rights. It is drawn from data collected during ongoing monitoring of sexual and reproductive health policies and programmes in Peru since 1998 for the Centre for Health and Gender Equity (CHANGE). Accomplishments since 1994 in Peru demonstrate good faith on the part of the government and foreign donors to make progress towards fulfilling the ICPD agenda by addressing key reproductive health concerns and promoting women’s rights. Unfortunately, this progress has not been consistent. It has been overshadowed by two periods of anti-choice policies and interventions. The first, in 1996–97 under the Fuijimori government, was a demographic approach that used numerical targets and undue pressure on women to accept sterilisation as the government’s main poverty reduction strategy, which led to documented abuses. The second, in 2001–03 under the Toledo government, was a far-right approach that worked to limit access to essential services, including emergency contraception, condoms and post-abortion care. In spite of their contradictory nature, these two policy approaches have been the greatest obstacles to making long-lasting improvements to reproductive health and rights in Peru.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2004. Vol. 12, no 24, 56-69 p.
Keyword [en]
anti-choice policies, anti-natalist population policy, reproductive choice, Peru
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-55815OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-55815DiVA: diva2:530220
Available from: 2012-06-21 Created: 2012-06-01 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(337 kB)307 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 337 kBChecksum SHA-512
d55fc0dc3503cd9200ecf86914131dd507497d04bcc55d08849862ac3d04817442818698f900a789683b6a4fd966751543d7841660e560d7ba5f044bbcbe9644
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3776582

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Coe, Anna-Britt
In the same journal
Reproductive health matters
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 307 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 122 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf