Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revisorns resonemang i moraliska termer kring oberoendefrågor
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business.
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business.
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

ABSTRACT

The auditor independence is constantly being questioned while discussing whether the auditor is really independent from the client. There are also factors threatening the auditor’s independency and decreasing the legitimacy towards the auditors. One example is the long-term relationship between the auditor and the client.

The analysis model is the most useful for the auditor to control his independency. Former studies show that the auditor’s judgments about the threat to independence differed among the auditors. The arguments or judgments based on the auditor’s interpretation, valuation and experience might cause problems. These can occur due to the fact that all auditors do not have the same opinion about what ethics and moral stands for.

Purpose: The purpose of this essay is to enlighten how auditors argue in moral terms in the question of independence.

Method: As our method we chose interviews, in order to receive more qualitative results to get analysed. We interviewed eight chartered auditors. As they wanted to stay anonymous, we chose not to mention their names.

Conclusion: Some auditors argue on the basis of past experience and personal qualities. This affects the auditor´s idea of what they choose to see as important information and how they judge a situation. This study has proved that the judgment of each person decides the results. It has been shown that the way the auditors argue depends on different moral teachings, which means that the auditor is either a deontologist, an egoist, an utilitarian or a virtue ethicist. Due to this our results are ambiguous.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 61 p.
Keyword [sv]
Etik och moral, revisorns bedömning, oberoende
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-23190ISRN: ORU-HHS/FEK-AS-2012/0029--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-23190DiVA: diva2:530096
Subject / course
Företagsekonomi
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-10-15 Created: 2012-05-31 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1056 kB)295 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1056 kBChecksum SHA-512
b106a91f3112bca8fab18cf22981ece0d270390aabba41d82f2db6f927276de519955cacadc18008814c066eae9e0ab91cd6345e4727e1199bc8987855415edc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cebe, JuliaBoyaci, Gabriella
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 295 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 301 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf