Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Olfactory sensitivity of human subjects for six predator odorants
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of the present study was to determine olfactory detection thresholds in human subjects for a set of six sulfur-containing odorants which are known to be components of mammalian predator odors. Using a threealternative ascending staircase procedure, the olfactory sensitivity of 12 healthy adult human subjects, 6 males and 6 females was assessed with 2-propylthietane, 2,2-dimethylthietane, 3-mercapto-3-methylbutan-1-ol, 3-mercapto-3- methylbutyl formate, 3-methyl-1-butanethiol, and methyl-2-phenylethyl sulfide. The results showed that A) all six predator odorants were detected at concentrations below 1 ppb (parts per billion), and one of them (3-mercapto-3-methylbutyl formate) even at a concentration below 1 ppt (parts per trillion), B) structurally similar odorants yielded significantly different threshold values, and C) no significant sex differences were found in olfactory sensitivity with any of the six odorants. The findings obtained from the present study show that human subjects were not generally less sensitive to the predator odorants tested here compared to spider monkeys despite having a markedly lower number of olfactory receptor types. Further, they suggest that humans may be more sensitive to predator odorants compared to a variety of non-predator odorants. One possible explanation for the high olfactory sensitivity observed here is the fact that sulfur compounds typically can be detected at low concentrations. An alternative explanation derives from an evolutionary perspective as our human ancestors were a potential prey of large carnivores and  thus a high olfactory sensitivity for predator odors should be adaptive for humans.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 18 p.
Keyword [en]
Human olfactory sensitivity, predator odor, sulfur-containing odorant, sex difference
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-77816ISRN: LiTH-IFM- Ex--12/2680--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-77816DiVA: diva2:529630
Subject / course
Biology
Uppsok
Agriculture, Veterinary Medicine, Forestry
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-06-05 Created: 2012-05-30 Last updated: 2012-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1209 kB)377 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1209 kBChecksum SHA-512
3e9f8121cd9c13c7c9385fff9b8bc8404068efefaf732150be03f0ba126cffbff337596e6ea2ebea15db50f5378acf2aa9ce9c8af113505116b2ccd165c01255
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sarrafchi, Amir
By organisation
Department of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyThe Institute of Technology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 377 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 151 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf