Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identifying Conflict Prevention Measures: Comparing Two Approaches
Folke Bernadotte Academy, Stockholm.
2010 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The study of conflict prevention has only recently become moresystematic and moved away from an exclusive reliance on casestudies. With the efforts of the Uppsala Conflict Data Program(UCDP) and the Folke Bernadotte Academy, a dataset of thirdparty measures taken in armed conflicts at low intensity hasbeen created. The dataset, ‘Managing Intrastate Low-level Conflicts’(MILC) covers all existing low-level armed conflicts for theperiod of 1993-2004.There is a lingering discussion regarding whether systematicallycollected data based on news media sources, other currentreports and general insight actually captures the events thatdiplomats, mediators and other actors would regard as significant.Some would even question if systematic data like the MILCdataset can generate an accurate and unbiased account of thephenomena it tries to quantify. This study is responding to theseconcerns by comparing news based information with informationbased on memoirs and historical accounts.Analyzing the case of Burundi using both approaches, the purposeof this study is to see if different approaches will result ina similar or different understanding of third party activities ina particular crisis. Comparing the MILC dataset with data collectedin other ways and using other types of material will helpus understand the strengths and limitations of a systematic approachbased on news reports. This in turn will provide a betterfoundation for interpreting and analysing this systematic data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala, 2010. , 41 p.
Series
UCDP Papers, ISSN 1653-4573 ; 5
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Peace and Conflict Research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-174825ISBN: 978-91-506-2168-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-174825DiVA: diva2:529106
Available from: 2012-05-29 Created: 2012-05-29 Last updated: 2012-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(514 kB)162 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 514 kBChecksum SHA-512
77f8f9fe9c24dd7a04daf129b69eb316198cf48fc7ec2eff74459dfcf3c6cee8a096505b707086565153825f16180fd6442db6a5cabb335e2b46b97d173fcd68
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 162 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 408 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf