Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What do we know about Firms’ Research Collaborationwith Universities?: New Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Economics. KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Centres, Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, CESIS.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0820-2769
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5871-8571
2006 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This chapter provides an integrated view of knowledge transfer between university and industryby combining two different approaches. First, we report results from an econometric analysis,where recent matching techniques are used on a dataset of 2,071 Swedish firms. Our findingsfrom this analysis strongly suggest that university collaboration has a positive influence on theinnovative activity of large manufacturing firms. In contrast, there appears to be an insignificantassociation between university collaboration and the average service firm’s innovation output.Second, in the pursuit of credible explanations for these findings, we apply a semi-structuredinterview methodology on 39 randomly selected firms collaborating with two researchuniversities in Stockholm, Sweden. We identify three ideas for how collaboration may help firmsbecome more innovative in the literature of innovation studies. In analysis of the interviews, wefind very weak support for the first idea; that firms are able to exploit and market innovationsoriginating in the university. The second idea – that firms improve their internal innovativecapability by collaboration – is found to apply to about half of the investigated firms. Innovationefficiency gains in the form of reduced cost and risk for innovation projects, which is a third ideasuggested by the literature, are also suggested to be a major factor behind firms’ benefits. Finally,we offer tentative explanations for the lack of measurable effects of collaboration for servicefirms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
CESIS, KTH Royal Institute of Technology , 2006. , 28 p.
Series
CESIS Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation, 74
Keyword [en]
University-Industry Link, Innovation, Technology transfer, R&D, Research collaboration
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-72294OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-72294DiVA: diva2:487430
Note
QC 20120208Available from: 2012-02-08 Created: 2012-01-31 Last updated: 2012-02-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

CESISWP74(163 kB)81 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 163 kBChecksum SHA-512
7934042d0b5928251fe61a6cdc1ba32157de105d2076b872f93931ac071526a1f481fcfcebe1e3d239da19d72a3c7fb4ac28702018a3c3d46c5f698fd948552c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Broström, AndersLööf, Hans
By organisation
EconomicsCentre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, CESIS
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 81 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf