Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Kriget i Afghanistan - ett nödvändigt ont?: En kritisk diskursanalys av New York Times ställningstagande till och framing av kriget i Afghanistan
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Media and Communication Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Media and Communication Studies.
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
The war in Afghanistan - a necessary evil? : A critical discourse analysis of The New York Times position on and framing of the war in Afghanistan (English)
Abstract [en]

Abstract

Title: The war in Afghanistan – a necessary evil? (Kriget i Afghanistan – ett nödvändigt ont? En kritisk diskursanalys av New York Times ställningstagande till och framing av kriget i Afghanistan)

Number of pages: 41 (41 including enclosures)

Authors: Jenny Häggmark, Madeleine Jansson

Tutor: Christian Christensen

Course: Media and Communication Studies C

Period: Fall term 2011

University: Division of Media and Communication, Department of Information Science, Uppsala University

Purpose/aim: Our main goal with this paper is to examine and describe how The New York Times have framed the war in Afghanistan in their editorials, and how their position on the war is reflected in the editorials. We are also interested in finding out if their position on the war has changed during the ten years of war. Are the New York Times editorials characterized by peace or war journalism?

Material/Method: To fulfill our aim with this paper we are going to use a qualitative method of content analyzes, the critical discourse analysis, when we analyze the editorials selected. The material consists of 40 editorials from The New York Times from four different years – 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2011 – ten from each year. We will analyze these editorials using Johan Galtung’s theory of peace and war journalism, along with the theory of framing, using Robert M. Entman’s definition as a base.

Main results: Our main results are that The New York Times has changed their position on the war in Afghanistan since it started in 2001. The first two years that we have analyzed, 2001 and 2004, The New York Times were positive towards the war. However, their position on the war has been negative or neutral in the studied editorials from 2007 and 2011. Our results show that The New York Times framed the war in six salient frames – position, peace, war, nation building/democracy in Afghanistan, “us and them”, and criticism against the Bush administration. The editorials from 2001 are characterized as war journalism while the majority of the editorials from the following years are characterized as peace journalism.

Key words: War in Afghanistan, framing, peace journalism, war journalism, New York Times, editorials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 41 p.
Keyword [en]
The war in Afghanistan, peace journalism, war journalism, New York Times, framing, editorials
Keyword [sv]
Kriget i Afghanistan, fredsjournalistik, krigsjournalistik, New York Times, framing, ledarartiklar
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-167152OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-167152DiVA: diva2:482431
Subject / course
Media and Communication Studies
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-02-01 Created: 2012-01-22 Last updated: 2012-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(290 kB)519 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 290 kBChecksum SHA-512
4189a1dde6b00e18222fdb2bb0a84adf4a1d7f36cfb8ad72784599f81528c07289b1aa7376d9be589b7219a381b5404e8bdb9c3a6f9cbe007b897b8855624e75
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Media and Communication Studies
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 519 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1002 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf