Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Den prekvalificerade tävlingen – hur utses arkitekter till inbjudna arkitekttävlingar?
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Architecture. (arc•plan)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9715-9656
2011 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This research report presents findings from a study of prequalification in architectural competitions. The aim was to develop knowledge of how organizers select architects/teams to invited competitions. Prequalification is a procedure of selection used early in the competition process for identifying suitable candidates for the following design phase. Usually three to six architectural firms/teams are invited to develop design solutions for the competition task. The research question is about how the organizers find these candidates.

 

There are ten competitions examined in the study. Five municipal competitions and five organised by government clients. The reason for the selection of cases is that the public sector is a major organizer of competitions in Sweden. The methodology of the investigation is a combination of mapping, case studies and document review. Results show that there are 375 applications from architects in the competitions. 43 architect firms/teams (11 %) have been invited to competitions. The vast majority of the applications (84 %) came from Sweden. This is explained by the fact that organizers require Swedish as the competition language.

 

All the organizers used a selection process that included two distinct phases. The clients start by checking whether the applications meet the requirements specified in the invitation. This is followed by an evaluative phase with assessment of the architectural offices professional profile, supported by relevant reference projects and personal references. Decisive in the final assessment is the organizer’s evaluation of the candidates’ ability to produce the project with architectural quality, to combine creative solutions with functional demands and to cooperate with developers and contractors. The assessment in the second evaluative phase is performed with the support of three different methods: voting among reviewers, scoring merits in applications or by an overall assessment of candidates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. , 52 p.
Series
Trita-ARK. Forskningspublikationer, ISSN 1402-7453 ; 2011:1
Keyword [sv]
Prekvalificering, arkitekttävling
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-61494ISBN: 978-91-7501-069-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-61494DiVA: diva2:479244
Note
QC 20120126Available from: 2012-01-26 Created: 2012-01-17 Last updated: 2012-01-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2694 kB)197 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2694 kBChecksum SHA-512
550ee8dbb60358886a23c9783777241eb7bb704c1dc6cc013a659bb3bb2bec593113cff428d01007882095900937ab5d58cb552482febc09aed4a6d098739c89
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rönn, Magnus
By organisation
Architecture
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 197 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 172 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf