Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mad or Bad?: Explaining the different outcomes of reforming treatment organisation for mentally disordered offenders in Britain & Sweden
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2004 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Britain and Sweden have had similar backgrounds when it comes to organising treatment of Mentally Disordered Offenders who are sentenced to forensic psychiatric care instead of prison. Traditionally care has been centrally controlled and isolated from mainstream healthcare structures. However since the 1980s, both countries have had similar stated policy objectives of wanting to integrate services for forensic psychiatric treatment into general healthcare structures. Both countries have regionally organised healthcare with decisions on treatment provision made by the regional organisation. The term integration suggests that forensic services would be decentralised to Health Authorities in the same way as other healthcare services. Yet these seemingly similar policy objectives have resulted in very different outcomes. This leads to a puzzle, what is the explanation for the differing outcomes? This study aims to explain the reason(s) for the different outcomes by tracing the causative process using a comparative case-study method. The study demonstrates that both political institutions and service culture explain why Sweden was able to decentralise forensic psychiatric treatment but not Britain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. , 53 p.
Keyword [en]
mental health, criminal justice, Sweden, Britain, administrative traditions, care-philosophy
National Category
Social Sciences Political Science Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-166755OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-166755DiVA: diva2:477410
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2012-01-19 Created: 2012-01-13 Last updated: 2012-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Mad or Bad?(373 kB)316 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 373 kBChecksum SHA-512
5f9eaadb4391cc8fcf0586a614de2ea6ae6c4979dac175b15aeec067d2d68c511e2851eb036ac075cffc34d84572df61c570210ebba4af85255101bf23d6d6ca
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maycraft Kall, Wendy Katherine
By organisation
Department of Government
Social SciencesPolitical SciencePublic Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 316 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 542 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf