Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Correlates of male fitness in captive zebra finches: a comparison of methods to disentangle genetic and environmental effects
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology.
2011 (English)In: BMC Evolutionary Biology, ISSN 1471-2148, E-ISSN 1471-2148, Vol. 11, 327- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Backgound: It is a common observation in evolutionary studies that larger, more ornamented or earlier breeding individuals have higher fitness, but that body size, ornamentation or breeding time does not change despite of sometimes substantial heritability for these traits. A possible explanation for this is that these traits do not causally affect fitness, but rather happen to be indirectly correlated with fitness via unmeasured non-heritable aspects of condition (e. g. undernourished offspring grow small and have low fitness as adults due to poor health). Whether this explanation applies to a specific case can be examined by decomposing the covariance between trait and fitness into its genetic and environmental components using pedigree-based animal models. We here examine different methods of doing this for a captive zebra finch population where male fitness was measured in communal aviaries in relation to three phenotypic traits (tarsus length, beak colour and song rate). Results: Our case study illustrates how methods that regress fitness over breeding values for phenotypic traits yield biased estimates as well as anti-conservative standard errors. Hence, it is necessary to estimate the genetic and environmental covariances between trait and fitness directly from a bivariate model. This method, however, is very demanding in terms of sample sizes. In our study parameter estimates of selection gradients for tarsus were consistent with the hypothesis of environmentally induced bias (beta(A) = 0.035 +/- 0.25 (SE), beta(E) = 0.57 +/- 0.28 (SE)), yet this differences between genetic and environmental selection gradients falls short of statistical significance. Conclusions: To examine the generality of the idea that phenotypic selection gradients for certain traits (like size) are consistently upwardly biased by environmental covariance a meta-analysis across study systems will be needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 11, 327- p.
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-166072DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-327ISI: 000297650800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-166072DiVA: diva2:476871
Available from: 2012-01-12 Created: 2012-01-10 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(385 kB)143 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 385 kBChecksum SHA-512
3b472b0fa3057eb3d73311ba1d94dd5619bc072b9f1b18720900ba040adf238562ba01bacb9b732e60ee37937500232918895af6f575bee16de6795794498476
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Schielzeth, Holger

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schielzeth, Holger
By organisation
Evolutionary Biology
In the same journal
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 143 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 439 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf