Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
On the Performance of Optimal Input Signals for Frequency Response Estimation
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Automatic Control. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Centres, ACCESS Linnaeus Centre. (System Identification Group)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1927-1690
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Automatic Control. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Centres, ACCESS Linnaeus Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9368-3079
Uppsala University.
2012 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, ISSN 0018-9286, E-ISSN 1558-2523, Vol. 57, no 5, 766-771 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We consider the problem of minimum-variance excitation design for frequency response estimation based on finite impulse response (FIR) and output error (OE) models. The objective is to minimize the power of the input signal to be used in the system identification experiment subject to a model accuracy constraint. For FIR and OE models this leads to a finite dimensional semi-definite programming optimization problem. We study, in detail, how to apply this approach to the estimation of the frequency response at a given frequency, . The first case concerns minimizing the asymptotic variance of the estimated frequency response based on an FIR model estimate. We compare the optimal input signal with a sinusoidal signal with frequency that gives the same model accuracy, and show that the input power can, at best, be reduced by a factor of two when using the optimal input signal. Conditions are given under which the sinusoidal signal is optimal, and it is shown that this is a common case for higher order FIR models. Next, we study FIR model based estimation of the absolute value and phase of the frequency response at a given frequency, . We derive the corresponding optimal input signals and compare their performances with that of a sinusoidal input signal with frequency . The relative reduction of input power when using the optimal solution is at best a factor of two. Finally, we discuss how to extend the FIR results to OE system identification by using an input parametrization proposed by Stoica and Söderström (1982).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE , 2012. Vol. 57, no 5, 766-771 p.
Keyword [en]
Covariance matrix, Estimation, Finite impulse response filter, Frequency response, Optimization, Symmetric matrices, Upper bound
National Category
Control Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-55466DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2166322ISI: 000300845400022ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84857710077OAI: diva2:471660
Swedish Research CouncilICT - The Next Generation


Available from: 2012-01-19 Created: 2012-01-02 Last updated: 2013-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

IR-EE-RT 2010:034(94 kB)83 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 94 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusIEEEXplore

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wahlberg, BoHjalmarsson, Håkan
By organisation
Automatic ControlACCESS Linnaeus Centre
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 83 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 80 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link