Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Health care for immigrants in Europe: Is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study
NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands. .
Etab Publ Sante Maison Blanche, F-75019 Paris, France. .
Queen Mary Univ London, Unit Social & Community Psychiat, Newham Ctr Mental Hlth, London E13 8SP, England. .
Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Hlth & Soc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. .
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 11, Art. no. 699- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: European Member States are facing a challenge to provide accessible and effective health care services for immigrants. It remains unclear how best to achieve this and what characterises good practice in increasingly multicultural societies across Europe. This study assessed the views and values of professionals working in different health care contexts and in different European countries as to what constitutes good practice in health care for immigrants. Methods: A total of 134 experts in 16 EU Member States participated in a three-round Delphi process. The experts represented four different fields: academia, Non-Governmental Organisations, policy-making and health care practice. For each country, the process aimed to produce a national consensus list of the most important factors characterising good practice in health care for migrants. Results: The scoring procedures resulted in 10 to 16 factors being identified as the most important for each participating country. All 186 factors were aggregated into 9 themes: (1) easy and equal access to health care, (2) empowerment of migrants, (3) culturally sensitive health care services, (4) quality of care, (5) patient/health care provider communication, (6) respect towards migrants, (7) networking in and outside health services, (8) targeted outreach activities, and (9) availability of data about specificities in migrant health care and prevention. Although local political debate, level of immigration and the nature of local health care systems influenced the selection and rating of factors within each country, there was a broad European consensus on most factors. Yet, discordance remained both within countries, e. g. on the need for prioritising cultural differences, and between countries, e. g. on the need for more consistent governance of health care services for immigrants. Conclusions: Experts across Europe asserted the right to culturally sensitive health care for all immigrants. There is a broad consensus among experts about the major principles of good practice that need to be implemented across Europe. However, there also is some disagreement both within and between countries on specific issues that require further research and debate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 11, Art. no. 699- p.
Keyword [en]
Health services; immigrants; Europe; good practice; Delphi
National Category
Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-15163DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-699ISI: 000295382200002ScopusID: 2-s2.0-80052679507OAI: diva2:463924
Available from: 2011-12-12 Created: 2011-12-12 Last updated: 2016-10-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(326 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 326 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Soares, Joaquim J. F.
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 50 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link