Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Influence of Semantically Related and Unrelated Text Cues on the Intelligibility of Sentences in Noise
Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Cognition, Development and Disability. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7810-1333
Vrije University of Amsterdam Medical Centre.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Ear and Hearing, ISSN 0196-0202, E-ISSN 1538-4667, ISSN 0196-0202, Vol. 32, no 6, E16-E25 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: In two experiments with different subject groups, we explored the relationship between semantic context and intelligibility by examining the influence of visually presented, semantically related, and unrelated three-word text cues on perception of spoken sentences in stationary noise across a range of speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). In addition, in Experiment (Exp) 2, we explored the relationship between individual differences in cognitive factors and the effect of the cues on speech intelligibility. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanDesign: In Exp 1, cues had been generated by participants themselves in a previous test session (own) or by someone else (alien). These cues were either appropriate for that sentence (match) or for a different sentence (mismatch). A condition with nonword cues, generated by the experimenter, served as a control. Experimental sentences were presented at three SNRs (dB SNR) corresponding to the entirely correct repetition of 29%, 50%, or 71% of sentences (speech reception thresholds; SRTs). In Exp 2, semantically matching or mismatching cues and nonword cues were presented before sentences at SNRs corresponding to SRTs of 16% and 29%. The participants in Exp 2 also performed tests of verbal working memory capacity and the ability to read partially masked text. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: In Exp 1, matching cues improved perception relative to the nonword and mismatching cues, with largest benefits at the SNR corresponding to 29% performance in the SRT task. Mismatching cues did not impair speech perception relative to the nonword cue condition, and no difference in the effect of own and alien matching cues was observed. In Exp 2, matching cues improved speech perception as measured using both the percentage of correctly reported words and the percentage of entirely correctly reported sentences. Mismatching cues reduced the percentage of repeated words (but not the sentence-based scores) compared with the nonword cue condition. Working memory capacity and ability to read partly masked sentences were positively associated with the number of sentences repeated entirely correctly in the mismatch condition at the 29% SNR. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: In difficult listening conditions, both relevant and irrelevant semantic context can influence speech perception in noise. High working memory capacity and good linguistic skills are associated with a greater ability to inhibit irrelevant context when uncued sentence intelligibility is around 29% correct.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins , 2011. Vol. 32, no 6, E16-E25 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-72261DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228036aISI: 000296586900003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-72261DiVA: diva2:458807
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council||

Available from: 2013-04-11 Created: 2011-11-24 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(417 kB)605 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 417 kBChecksum SHA-512
51d11f14a03d4497503ea8dc61e1948833c29b1eabc4ecff6818360f3e91613986c56a4c60199a3326b42ba8b47b26778007c7cf0a2a62207086941e0e3b71aa
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zekveld, AdrianaRudner, MaryJohnsrude, IngridRönnberg, Jerker
By organisation
The Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchDisability ResearchFaculty of Arts and SciencesCognition, Development and DisabilityDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
In the same journal
Ear and Hearing
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 605 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 382 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf