Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does vote differention affect dividend payout policy?: A study on swedish listed firms
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis investigates what effects control enhancing mechanisms that are associated with vote differentiation have on dividend payout policy among Swedish listed firms. The data collected for this study is for the period 2005-2007 and the sample consists of 109 companies where 61 of these have shares that are vote differentiated, and the remaining 48 companies have the one share –one vote structure. The variables in the regressions are dividend payout ratio, a dummy for vote differentiation, growth in earnings, size, Tobin’s Q and ownership structure. Three separate hypotheses are applied for reaching a scientific answer to the thesis question. The results indicate that dividend payout policy is significantly negatively affected by the presence of vote differentiation and that vote concentration among the five largest shareholders is generally higher in such firms. The results do also indicate that dividend payout is determined by firm size, growth and investment performance which are in line with earlier studies. From the results, parallels have been drawn between investment performance, ownership concentration, vote differentiation and dividend payout policy. Firms that have vote differentiated shares tend to overinvest instead of paying out dividends when this presumably would be a more appropriate decision considering the aspect of efficiency. As a final conclusion based on the findings, the thesis confirms the argument on that vote differentiating among shares should be reconsidered for better reforms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 30 p.
Keyword [en]
Control Enhancing Mechanisms, Vote Differentiation, Dividend Payout Policy, Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-16118OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-16118DiVA: diva2:442440
Subject / course
IHH, Economics
Presentation
2011-07-08, Jönköping, 08:00 (English)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-09-21 Created: 2011-09-21 Last updated: 2011-09-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

MirjamDundeberg examensarbete(962 kB)407 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 962 kBChecksum SHA-512
593019ef1e22a59bf929dc497d7cbf6a84ca232155c93fe48816b20c30257462acc6c3b3cde972d6a8aa554c14fe2235c75a2a56214c082cffbf4fe2b6f557cd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dundeberg, Mirjam
By organisation
JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 407 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 446 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf