Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Thomas Pogge's Theory of a Minimally Just Global Institutional Order
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The immense inequalities between the world’s poor and the world’s rich have compelledphilosopher Thomas Pogge to develop a moral framework based on the Universal Declarationof Human Rights that challenges our most commonsense political moral views. Poggedisputes minimally and universally that we all have a negative duty not to harm so long as theharm is foreseeable and avoidable, rather than a positive duty to do well. Furthermore Poggeargues for an institutional view of negative duties flown from the fact that we all shape,uphold and impose institutions.With the help of three philosophers; Polly Vizard, Tim Hayward and Mathias Risse, Idebate a number of their raised objections to Thomas Pogge’s theory of institutional globaljustice which all focus on the controversial causal claim that the present global order causesglobal poverty. The objections discussed are (a) Vizard’s scrutinizing of Pogge’s notion ofresponsibility (b) Hayward’s call for a full causal account of how the global order is harmingthe poor and (c) Risse’s alternative baseline for harm. I argue that although Pogge has somepotential problems, he nevertheless is not contradicted by these objections to the extent thatthey themselves claim. I hold that the debated criticism appeals for further investigation andthat in light of the arguments in this thesis we have a negative duty not to harm and a positiveobligation to reform global unjust institutions in responding to global poverty.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 28 p.
Keyword [en]
Negative duties, Global Justice, Global Poverty, Obligation, Applied Philosophy, Reform
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-5244OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-5244DiVA: diva2:433656
Subject / course
Philosophy
Educational program
Consciousness Studies - Philosophy and Neuropsychology
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-08-19 Created: 2011-08-10 Last updated: 2011-08-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(387 kB)956 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 387 kBChecksum SHA-512
bfaa0a9bc157f37f525370e7797073b7912e66db486b38c3570e58c884ff721bfab1f00d16ae7183508d41150e0c19b90964d5772ab02d7f2cb745946ac4f838
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Humanities and Informatics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 956 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 325 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf