Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Who will use claims data for the prevention of occupational trauma?
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Centres, Centre for Health and Building, CHB.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4068-6794
2003 (English)In: Safety Science Monitor, ISSN 1443-8844, Vol. 7, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

If claims data from the public fund workers' compensation system is merged with the relevant census data, the relative distribution of occupational injury risk in the system can be calculated. A reconstituted occupational code, made from combining the present occupational and industrial codes, can be used to differentiate occupations in relation to hazards. A four-part injury severity index, generated in the claims settling process, can be used to further differentiate occupations, tasks and activities in terms of priorities for intervention.

Occupational injury incidence and severity in Victoria between 1992 and 2000 were analysed. Among large and small occupational groups the combined criteria of high annual injury incidence and extreme injury severity identified the occupational groups which represent the top priorities for occupational trauma prevention counter-measures in Victoria (Larsson & Field, 2002a, 2002b). All claims for over-exertion and soft tissue injury ("sprains and strains") between 1996 and 2000 (45% of the total claims volume) were analysed with specific control for age and gender. Detailed information on accident processes and exposures commonly involved were retrieved from the claims files. The top priority groups in terms of countermeasures were identified with a combination of the variables industry, occupation, age, gender and hazardous activity associated with the trauma (Larsson et al, 2001).

However, the development of systematic and detailed prevention information does not necessarily generate any prevention activities or interventions actioned by the combined public fund workers' compensation and industrial safety inspectorate system. In fact, it seems that systematic injury information is not commonly used for prevention by the public fund workers' compensation system and this might be due to a number of factors like:

· actuaries determine policies in the insurance and prevention is not properly defined,

· no proper agents for injury prevention exist in the system,

· legislation and regulation is built for prosecution, not prevention,

· safety and health is seen as commodities to be left to market forces, demand and private investment,

· the only suitable workers' compensation insurance intervention is information (pamphlets, posters, advertising campaigns, etc).

The roles of public fund workers' compensation systems, unions and collective and individual employers in practical and applied occupational injury prevention needs to be critically appraised. To move from statistics and dinner speeches to measurable reduction of clearly identified work-related injury problems, the methods and the appropriate agents for cost-efficient and systematic intervention against occupational trauma must be credibly defined.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 7, no 1
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-36045OAI: diva2:430012
QC 20110809Available from: 2011-08-09 Created: 2011-07-06 Last updated: 2011-08-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Who will use Claims Data for the Prevention of Occupational Trauma(75 kB)68 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 75 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, Tore J
By organisation
Centre for Health and Building, CHB
In the same journal
Safety Science Monitor

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 44 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link