Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Persuasiva spel: Ett medium med spännande möjligheter: Procedurell retorik i två svenska opinionsbildande datorspel
Södertörn University College, School of Communication, Media and it.
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This essay is about the principles and rules that control persuasive computer games. The term persuasive games mean computer games, video games and other similar artifacts that are produced to shape opinion. The rhetorical scholar Ian Bogost at Georgia Tech claims that this kind of games mainly get their persuasive power by using procedural rhetoric and that games as a medium gives special conditions for procedurality.  By procedural rhetoric Bogost means an argumentation that is based on rules and choices, as opposed to texts, movies and images. (Bogost 2007). Bogost describes these procedures as quite specific for games and claims that they differ qualitatively from “ordinary” rhetorical arguments even if they just as other arguments work by establishing enthymems. However when I in my preliminary study tried this hypothesis, I seemed to distinguish several similarities with argumentation strategies used in political or juridical debate, such as Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca´s associative argumentation techniques. In this essay I examine if and how Perelman and Olbrechs-Tytecas associative argumentation techniques can be used to describe (and understand?) rulebased rhetorical procedures in persuasive games. This analysis is carried out on two recent Swedish persuasive games and proves the hypothesis fruitful. This result also points to the possibility to view rules as something that control all forms of argumentation. Despite this result, the investigation doesn´t contradict the presumption that computer games in many ways, have specific possibilities, beyond procedural rhetoric, such as the opportunity for interaction, receiver adaptation, and the capacity to process big amounts of data. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 55 p.
Keyword [en]
Procedural rhetoric, persuasive games, Ian Bogost, gamification, associative argumentation techniques, game theory, rhetoric, Perelman, Olbrechts-Tyteca, computer games
Keyword [sv]
Procedurell retorik, persuasive spel, Ian Bogost, gamification, associativa argumentationstekniker, spelretorik, datorspel
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-9781OAI: diva2:429788
Subject / course
Humanities, Theology
Available from: 2011-07-06 Created: 2011-07-05 Last updated: 2011-07-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1178 kB)705 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1178 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Haag, Nils
By organisation
School of Communication, Media and it
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 705 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 474 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link