Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dold samäganderätt: Är det nuvarande systemet konsekvent?
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Accounting and Law.
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The meaning of the covert co-ownership is that the parties must have intended that the property should be their common. A party must, to be able to claim ownership, have con-tributed to the acquisition financing through the financial contribution. Further shall the fact that the property should be their common be agreed or have been assumed by the par-ties. There are the circumstances for the purchase that should be considered in determining if covert co-ownership is presumed. Covert co-ownership has been established although one party only contributed a small part to the acquisition. The party with a possible loan is also considered to have acquired the property, although the party who claims to be the hidden owner is the one who pays the loan. If one of the parties has received a soft loan or a preferential price, the difference seems to be viewed as a financial contribution, which al-so applies to work on the property. The requirements for covert co-ownership of property is the same at cohabitation compared with marriage and case law in the area ends in the same result, so there is no difference for the two forms of relationship. Although the par-ties have established cohabitation agreement or marriage contract for a property have co-vert co-ownership still been considered to exist. The perception is not in that clear condi-tion which had to be expected in the current situation. The fact that case law does not al-ways reach the same result also shows that there are no clear conditions to follow for when the covert co-ownership shall be deemed to be achieved, despite the requirements estab-lished.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 34 p.
Keyword [sv]
Dold samäganderätt, Sambo, Äktenskap
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-15103OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-15103DiVA: diva2:419412
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-06-28 Created: 2011-05-26 Last updated: 2011-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(417 kB)1318 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 417 kBChecksum SHA-512
0306a1bb7bef92352d527e251f609834717f991dfe66203968e24ccf6ef7db7df5adc0584ada19c0a9c7352c42d6ff0a136b0d7ee3c2f1838541e1472343bbcc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Accounting and Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1318 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 498 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf