Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Short term Distributed Hydrological Modelling of Gaula Catchment
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering.
2010 (English)MasteroppgaveStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Testing and trying out of the applicability and utility of watershed hydrological models in different; catchment sizes, hydro-geologic conditions, soil conditions and with different time resolutions is necessary for a range of spatial scales to assess the utility of these models in water shade management means like flood protection, land slide prevention, erosion control etc. The main purpose of this thesis is to tryout TOPLAND hydrological model, i.e. the new developments to the LANDPINE model allowing for using TOPMODEL distributed runoff generation, with different precipitation input methods. It focuses on the simulation of precipitation events with time resolution of one hour. Short term time resolution event simulations are important to capture flow events in small and large catchments; since these events are responsible for local flood, land slide etc., especially in areas where they are strongly localized. The model simulation has been carried out using three different precipitation input methods; gauge IDW interpolation, gauge simulated and radar based precipitation data for the selected hourly events of 2006 (27-07-2006 00:00 to 29-07-2006 23:00) and 2009 (19-07-2009 05:00 to 25-07-2009 20:00).

2009 Event

The 2009 event is characterized by high peak and uniformly distributed event. For the bias corrected radar precipitation, the objective method of result comparison showed an excellent correspondence between observed and simulated flows with NS (R2) of 0.98, correlation (R2) of 0.98 and PBIAS of 0.48% at the calibration point (Gaulfoss). The bias corrected radar precipitation also showed a very good performance of the model at the interior uncalibrated gauging stations with average values of NS (R2) 0.85, correlation (R2) 0.93 and PBIAS 16.6% of the HugdalBru, Lillebudal and Eggafoss gauging stations. The gauge IDW interpolation and gauge simulated precipitation input methods also showed a very good performance of the model both at the calibration and internal uncalibrated gauging stations.

2006 Event

The 2006 event is characterized by low peak and unevenly distributed (localized) event. The bias corrected radar precipitation is the only precipitation input method that made possible for calibration of the model. The objective method of result comparison showed a very good result for NS (R2) of 0.96, correlation (R2) of 0.97 and PBIAS of 5.1% at the calibration point (Gaulfoss). At the internal uncalibrated gauging stations, the correlation and PBIAS showed a good performance with average correlation (R2) of 0.77 and PBIAS of 21.3% and a poor average NS (R2) of 0.3.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-12597OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ntnu-12597DiVA: diva2:418586
Available from: 2011-05-23 Created: 2011-05-23 Last updated: 2013-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltekst(8896 kB)201 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 8896 kBChecksum SHA-512
254bbb68e723cb7f79c0ed3afae6779f7aa214a73f7b5ce6fa36c46897525e44c1778303bf0145a51855598aed712f492d7bac9fe3aa40bbd3ebe8f3cf0ade1e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 201 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 111 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link