Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Pitfalls in comparative studies: Inherent and self-styled dangers
Södertörn University, Södertörn University Library. Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7748-6174
2008 (English)In: Comparative Adult Education 2008: Experiences and examples / [ed] Reischmann, Jost & Bron Jr, Michal, Frankfurt am Main: Lang , 2008, 65-80 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Every academic endeavour faces a number of problems that have to be dealt with. The goal of this chapter is to raise an awareness of the risks of falling into various traps awaiting researchers in comparative adult education. When pursuing an inquiry, a researcher in comparative studies can encounter three types of problems: (a) Difficulties typical for all research undertakings within the social sciences, such as objectivity, reliability, validity, selection, sustainability, reactivity, interpretation or consistency. Since these methodological difficulties are common to all research in the social sciences, this chapter does not pursue further discussion on the topic. (b) “Obstacles” – the most frequent are the lack of comparable information, variation in the quality and reliability of statistics, lack of uniform definitions, incurrence of travel expenses, communication problems, and the dependency on foreign contributors/information. Obstacles are considered as ‘normal’ because they must be tackled in almost every comparative research undertaking. They cannot be avoided and occur frequently enough to be consid¬ered as inherent to this type of study. Obstacles are often ‘objective’ or ‘exter¬nal’ to a researcher. (c) Pitfalls, however, are a more intricate phenomenon. They are often uncon¬scious mistakes, ignorant assumptions, or self-inflicted misinterpretations. A pitfall is usually a ‘self-styled danger,’ because the problem stems from the limited understanding of a researcher. Thus, a researcher, a team leader, or an editor is ultimately accountable for the pitfall. The objective of this chapter is to increase an understanding of pitfalls in com¬parative research, in order to prevent falling into such traps

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frankfurt am Main: Lang , 2008. 65-80 p.
Series
, Studies in Pedagogy, Andragogy and Gerontagogy, ISSN 0934-3695 ; 61
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Other research area
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-8429ISBN: 978-3-631-58235-0OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-8429DiVA: diva2:416200
Available from: 2011-05-10 Created: 2011-05-10 Last updated: 2015-07-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(273 kB)66 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 273 kBChecksum SHA-512
d0fab43d737a68e0ab2b524de88a3a9978de8009612c462896ffb109f2ce96e1858e06e88ad2aaa337e5085c427ea8a7992b37d4e4b9dc4bb8d086ebb0949e72
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bron Jr, Michal
By organisation
Södertörn University LibraryCentre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES)
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 66 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 123 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link