Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Enforcing Environmental Responsibilities: A Comparative Study of Environmental Administrative Law
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis is about the distrubution of responsibilities in the environmental law enforcement procedure, between the state and the individual environmental actor. The state and its public authorities have a fundamental environmental responsibility. This responsibility is nevertheless shared with the actors. Actor responsibilities include taking sufficient precautionary measures, and controling the own activities. This also covers responsibilities for knowledge and investigation, which are in focus in the thesis analysis. Such responsibilities are enforced by administrative authorities. Enforcement, however, also entails exercise of public power against the individual, and thus warrants proper procedure and safeguards of legal certainty. Such procedural responsibilities include ensuring decision making materials to support their exercise of authority. It also means that the authority has formulate clearly to the actor what their legal duties are, and what they need to do to avoid further enforcement. These administrative duties may entail the authority taking over the actor's information responsibilities under environmental law. Enforcement of actor responsibilities thus becomes inconsistent, or even contraproductive.

This thesis comprises analysis of the meeting of environmental and administrative law in the enforcement situation. The analysis is focused on balancing effective implementation and enforcement of policy aims, and the safeguards of the individual's rights and freedoms. The aims is to find ways to coordingate instead of prioritising these objectives. The research is based on a comparative study and analysis of the enforcement systems of Sweden, the United Kingdom (England and Wales), and the Netherlands. The importance of distinguising between the different purposes and aims of the responsibilities is argued. Actor responsibilities for precaution and information should be recognised also in the enforcement procedure. A communicative enforcement procedure, and more purposive assessment of the proper distribution of responsibilities in the individual case may provide both effective enforcement and legal certainty.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, 2011. , 631 p.
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Environmental Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-151797ISBN: 978-91-506-2215-7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-151797DiVA: diva2:411546
Public defence
2011-06-03, Sal IV, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Projects
ENFORCE
Available from: 2011-05-13 Created: 2011-04-18 Last updated: 2012-05-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3007 kB)1612 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3007 kBChecksum SHA-512
fef269934b9d224514ac114dc9c305830bc1def9e717967b798cc34cf1d6b6fe3795f742a4a3e8fe830205226b576ffdb40a653279032981ad0ab09b92a44556
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Distribution by Jure

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
K. Nilsson, Annika
By organisation
Department of Law
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1612 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 2547 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link